Reading mode Exit reading mode

Betsy DeVos: Rollback of Student Borrower Protections, For-Profit College Deregulation

DeVos, a billionaire Michigan donor with ties to the for-profit education industry through her family's investment portfolio, was confirmed in February 2017 in a 50-50 Senate vote — the first cabinet confirmation requiring Vice President Pence's tiebreaking vote in history. She immediately moved to suspend the Obama administration's Borrower Defense to Repayment rules, which provided a path for students defrauded by schools to have their federal loans discharged. More than 100,000 borrower defense applications accumulated while DeVos's department delayed processing them. Courts found the delays violated federal law. She also rescinded the Gainful Employment rule that required for-profit programs to demonstrate graduates could earn enough to service their student debt.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

Executive actions that exceed constitutional authority, circumvent statutory constraints, or weaponize government institutions for political ends. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Washington, D.C.
Category
Civil Rights
Legal posture
Active litigation
War-crime classification
Enabling conduct
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
No
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-first-term-betsy-devos-education-deregulation
Victims
Students defrauded by for-profit colleges who were denied debt relief they were legally entitled to; low-income and minority students disproportionately targeted by predatory for-profit institutions; taxpayers whose federal loan dollars funded institutions producing graduates with non-serviceable debt
Alleged responsible parties
  • Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education; suspended and restricted Borrower Defense to Repayment rules; rescinded Gainful Employment rule; delayed processing 100,000+ borrower defense claims; reinstated sanctioned accreditors; courts found her department's actions violated federal law in multiple rulings— Department of Education
  • Donald Trump, President; nominated DeVos knowing her connections to the for-profit education industry and her lack of public education experience; stood behind her policies through multiple court losses— White House

Key points

  • DeVos suspended the Obama administration's Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations on June 14, 2017, halting a process that allowed students defrauded by institutions like Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute to apply for federal loan discharge; more than 100,000 applications accumulated while the department delayed processing; a federal judge found in 2019 that the delays violated federal law and held DeVos in contempt of court
  • DeVos rescinded the Gainful Employment rule, which required for-profit colleges to demonstrate that their graduates had employment outcomes sufficient to service their student debt; the rule was designed to prevent federal loan money from flowing to programs that produced graduates with debt they could not repay; rescinding it removed a key accountability mechanism for the for-profit sector
  • DeVos reinstated two accreditors — the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) and another organization — that had previously been sanctioned for enabling institutions with poor student outcomes; ACICS had been the primary accreditor for Corinthian Colleges and ITT Tech before their collapses; reinstating it allowed institutions accredited by ACICS to access federal financial aid
  • A federal judge held DeVos in contempt of court in June 2019, fining the Department of Education $100,000 per day, after finding the department had continued to collect loan payments from defrauded Corinthian College students in violation of a court order to discharge their debts; the department said it had made an administrative error, but the judge found the violation was not inadvertent
  • The DeVos family's investment portfolio had exposure to student lending companies and for-profit education interests; critics argued her regulatory approach systematically benefited the for-profit education sector she and her family had financial connections to; she recused from some but not all decisions involving firms in which her family had investments
  • In August 2020, DeVos finalized new Borrower Defense rules that made it significantly harder for defrauded students to qualify for debt relief: requiring proof of specific misrepresentation, adding a means test based on average earnings for graduates of similar programs, and creating a partial relief framework that made full discharge more difficult; courts struck down several provisions of the rule as arbitrary and capricious

Overview

Students who were defrauded by for-profit colleges — institutions that in some cases sold worthless degrees at high prices to low-income and minority students using federal loan money — had a legal pathway to debt discharge. DeVos suspended that pathway, watched more than 100,000 applications pile up, was held in contempt of court for violating orders to process them, and then finalized new rules making relief harder to obtain. Courts struck down multiple provisions of her rules.

The Borrower Defense Program

The Borrower Defense to Repayment program exists because federal law provides that students defrauded by colleges can seek discharge of their federal student loans. The Obama administration built out a claims process following the collapse of Corinthian Colleges — an institution that had enrolled hundreds of thousands of students, collected billions in federal loan money, and left graduates with degrees that employers did not recognize.

DeVos suspended the processing machinery. Applications accumulated. Students who had been defrauded were in limbo — their debt continuing to accrue interest, their claims unprocessed. A federal judge found the delays violated federal law. The department continued to collect payments from Corinthian students in violation of a specific court order. The judge held the department in contempt and imposed a $100,000-per-day fine.

The Accreditor Reinstatement

ACICS had been the primary accreditor for Corinthian and ITT Tech — two of the largest for-profit college failures in American history. Federal policy had revoked ACICS recognition as an accreditor, cutting off the institutions it accredited from federal aid. DeVos moved to reinstate it.

The effect of ACICS reinstatement was to restore federal loan access to institutions operating under an accreditor that had demonstrably failed at its oversight function.

The Conflict Question

The DeVos family had investment exposure to the for-profit education and student lending industry. The regulatory approach that DeVos implemented systematically benefited that industry. She recused from some decisions but not all. The pattern of the deregulation — suspending borrower protections, rescinding employment outcome requirements, reinstating failed accreditors — aligned with the policy preferences of an industry in which her family had financial interests.

Update log

  1. Based on August 2020 finalization of DeVos borrower defense rules.

Sequence of events

  1. DeVos confirmed 50-50 — Pence casts historic tiebreaker

    DeVos is confirmed as Secretary of Education by a 50-50 Senate vote, the first time in history a Vice President had to cast a tiebreaking vote to confirm a cabinet nominee. Two Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins — voted against her.

  2. DeVos suspends Borrower Defense rules — 100,000 applications stall

    The Department of Education suspends the Obama-era Borrower Defense to Repayment rules, halting processing of claims from students defrauded by institutions including Corinthian Colleges and ITT Tech. More than 100,000 applications accumulate without action over subsequent years.

  3. Gainful Employment rule rescinded

    DeVos rescinds the Gainful Employment rule that required for-profit programs to demonstrate graduates could earn enough to service their student debt. Critics argue the rescission removes a key accountability mechanism for predatory institutions.

  4. Federal judge holds DeVos in contempt — $100,000 per day fine

    A federal judge holds the Department of Education in contempt for continuing to collect loan payments from defrauded Corinthian College students in violation of a court order to discharge their debts. The department is fined $100,000 per day. The department says it was an error.

  5. DeVos finalizes restrictive Borrower Defense rules — courts later strike provisions

    DeVos finalizes new Borrower Defense regulations that significantly limit student debt relief eligibility, including means testing and partial relief frameworks. Courts subsequently strike down several provisions as arbitrary and capricious. The Biden administration later rescinds the DeVos rules and processes the accumulated claims.

Sources

  1. DeVos Is Defying a Court Order, Students Say. A Judge Agrees. — The New York Times
  2. DeVos finalizes new borrower defense rules, sharply limiting student debt relief — The Washington Post
  3. DeVos rolls back protections for defrauded student borrowers — The Associated Press
  4. DeVos Education Department Record on Student Borrower Protections — Student Borrower Protection Center

How this record was published

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    HBCU Funding Cuts and Broken Promises: Trump's Record with Historically Black Colleges

    Trump used HBCUs as a political prop — signing executive orders promising prioritization while his budgets cut the funding those schools depended on. His administration cut the HBCU STEM research program, redirected grants, and proposed eliminating subsidized student loans on which HBCU students disproportionately relied. HBCU presidents who came to the White House for the high-profile signing ceremony were criticized by other HBCU advocates for lending legitimacy to a performance.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Lafayette Square: Protesters Gassed for Bible Photo Op

    Tear gas, pepper spray, and mounted police were deployed against peaceful protesters who were within their legal rights to be in Lafayette Square until the 7 PM curfew. The clearing operation began approximately 30 minutes before the curfew. Once the square was cleared, Trump walked out of the White House to St. John's Church, stood in front of it holding a Bible, and had photographs taken. The Episcopal bishop whose church was used said she was 'outraged' and had not been notified. Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley later apologized for participating in the walk. Defense Secretary Esper publicly opposed using active-duty troops as Trump had suggested.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Shithole Countries: Documented Racist Immigration Comments in White House Meeting

    The meeting was called to discuss a bipartisan immigration framework. Present were Senators Durbin (D-IL), Graham (R-SC), Flake (R-AZ), Perdue (R-GA), Cotton (R-AR), and others, along with DHS Secretary Nielsen. Multiple attendees confirmed the substance of the comments. The 'shithole' characterization was directed at Haiti and African nations; Trump contrasted them with Norway, where he had met with the prime minister the previous day. Nielsen testified to Congress that she did not recall the exact words used. Perdue and Cotton initially said they didn't recall the comments then claimed Trump hadn't used those specific words — a position contradicted by Durbin's direct confirmation and Graham's reported in-room response.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    DOGE-Style Attack on Voting: Trump Voter ID Orders, Voter Fraud Commission, State Intimidation

    Trump established the election integrity commission in response to his false claim that 3-5 million illegal votes had been cast in the 2016 election — a claim he made to explain why he had lost the popular vote. The commission's first action was a sweeping data request to all 50 states seeking voter rolls with personal data. States across the partisan spectrum refused. The commission operated for seven months, producing no findings. A member filed a lawsuit against the commission for operating without proper transparency. The commission was disbanded January 3, 2018; Trump attributed its dissolution to Democratic obstructionism.