Reading mode Exit reading mode

Zero Tolerance Family Separation: Systematic Removal of Children from Asylum-Seeking Parents

Attorney General Sessions announced a zero tolerance policy in April 2018 requiring criminal prosecution of all illegal border crossers. Because federal criminal custody excludes children, this automatically separated minors from their parents. Over 5,500 children were separated in six weeks. Courts ordered reunification; as of 2024, hundreds of families remain separated.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

Conduct that satisfies the legal elements of a war crime under the Rome Statute (Article 8), a crime against humanity (Article 7), or genocide (Article 6). Scale and definitions

Status
Ongoing
Incident date
Record updated
Location
U.S.-Mexico Border
Category
Deportation to Torture
Legal posture
Judicial finding
War-crime classification
Confirmed
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
Yes
Civilian casualties
5,500
Sources
7 cited
Stable ID
family-separation-zero-tolerance
Victims
Over 5,500 children separated from parents at the U.S.-Mexico border between April and June 2018; hundreds remain separated as of 2024
Alleged responsible parties
  • Jeff Sessions, Attorney General— Department of Justice
  • Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security— Department of Homeland Security
  • Donald Trump, President of the United States— White House

Key points

  • AG Sessions issued the 'zero tolerance' memo April 6, 2018, mandating criminal prosecution of all adults entering without authorization
  • Because children cannot be held in federal criminal custody, the policy mechanically separated every family; this effect was known and intended
  • Over 5,500 children were separated in six weeks; some were infants and toddlers; many were held in cages at Border Patrol facilities
  • Federal Judge Dana Sabraw ordered reunification by July 26, 2018; the government admitted it had no system for tracking separated families
  • Trump signed an executive order purporting to end family separation on June 20, 2018 — but the order was legally unworkable and separations continued
  • As of 2024, approximately 1,400 children have not been reunified with their parents, many of whom were deported without their children
  • A 2019 HHS Inspector General report found children showed 'intense trauma' including suicidal ideation, self-harm, and refusal to eat

Overview

The "zero tolerance" family separation policy was one of the first Trump administration's most widely condemned actions. By mandating criminal prosecution of every adult who crossed the border without authorization — including asylum seekers exercising a legal right under U.S. and international law — the policy automatically separated children from their parents, because federal criminal custody facilities do not accept minors.

Internal government communications later confirmed that senior administration officials knew that family separation would be the direct consequence of the policy and proceeded anyway, in some cases framing separation explicitly as a deterrent.

Scale and Conditions

The government separated more than 5,500 children from their parents between April and June 2018 alone. A later government audit found that thousands more had been separated in the months before the formal policy was announced, during earlier pilots in El Paso and the Rio Grande Valley.

Children — including infants and toddlers — were held in Border Patrol processing facilities described as "hieleras" (iceboxes) by detainees, where they slept on concrete floors under foil blankets in cage-like chain-link enclosures. The government had no tracking system linking children to their parents, which a federal court later described as a fundamental failure of basic record-keeping.

Federal Judge Dana Sabraw found in 2018 that the policy violated the Fifth Amendment's due process guarantee as applied to parents, and ordered all families reunified. The ACLU's Ms. L. v. ICE case remained active for years as the government struggled and repeatedly failed to comply with reunification timelines.

International Law Analysis

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Committee Against Torture, UNICEF, and Amnesty International all characterized the policy as a violation of international human rights law. Amnesty International stated that the conditions and psychological trauma inflicted on separated children met the legal definition of torture under the Convention Against Torture.

The policy also violated the principle that asylum seekers cannot be criminalized solely for entering without authorization — a protection codified in Article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention, which the United States helped draft.

Continuing Harm

As of 2024, approximately 1,400 children remain separated from parents who were deported without them. The Biden Family Reunification Task Force identified many families but has been unable to locate a significant subset of deported parents, some of whom may have died or gone into hiding in their countries of origin. The separation caused documented, severe, long-term psychological harm to both children and parents — harm that psychologists have characterized as a form of torture.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Convention Against TortureArticle 1Torture includes acts causing severe mental suffering inflicted by state agents — forcible separation of children from parents constitutes torture under this standard
Convention Against TortureArticle 16States must prevent cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment by public officials
Convention on the Rights of the ChildArticle 9Children shall not be separated from their parents against their will; any separation must be justified by the best interests of the child
International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsArticle 17No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with family
1951 Refugee ConventionArticle 33Non-refoulement — persons crossing borders to seek asylum cannot be criminally prosecuted solely for that act under international law

Update log

  1. Updated with Biden task force progress report showing hundreds of families remain separated.

  2. Biden task force reports first reunification flights, but thousands remain separated.

Sequence of events

  1. Early family separation pilots

    The administration quietly tests family separation in El Paso and the Rio Grande Valley without public announcement. Hundreds of families are separated before Congress learns of the practice.

  2. Zero tolerance memo issued

    AG Jeff Sessions issues a zero tolerance memo requiring U.S. attorneys to prosecute all adults crossing the border illegally, including those with accompanying children. The predictable result — family separation — is explicit in internal communications.

  3. Sessions announces zero tolerance publicly

    Sessions announces the policy in a speech, framing it as a deterrent: 'If you are smuggling a child, we will prosecute you, and that child may be separated from you.'

  4. Children in cages — media reports

    Photographs and reports emerge of children held in chain-link enclosures at Border Patrol facilities. The administration insists cages are used only temporarily.

  5. Inspector General confirms 2,700+ separations

    HHS OIG confirms that as of June 2018, 2,737 children had been separated from their parents under zero tolerance. The true number is later revised upward substantially.

  6. Trump signs executive order purporting to end family separation

    Under intense public pressure, Trump signs an order directing that families be detained together. Reunifications do not systematically occur; courts intervene.

  7. Federal judge orders reunification

    Judge Dana Sabraw of the Southern District of California orders the government to reunify all separated families within 30 days and children under 5 within 14 days. The government admits it has no tracking system.

  8. HHS OIG reports severe trauma

    HHS Inspector General publishes a report documenting 'intense trauma' in separated children, including suicidal ideation, self-harm, refusal to eat, and difficulty regulating emotions.

  9. Biden task force: 1,400+ still not reunified

    The Biden Family Reunification Task Force reports that approximately 1,400 children whose parents were deported without them remain separated; many parents cannot be located.

Sources

  1. Trump's 'Zero Tolerance' at the Border: What's Happening, and Why — The New York Times
  2. AP Exclusive: Feds may have separated thousands more migrant kids — The Associated Press
  3. Ms. L. v. ICE — ACLU Family Separation Challenge — ACLU
  4. Separated Children Placed in Office of Refugee Resettlement Care — HHS Office of Inspector General archived ✓
  5. Special Review — Initial Observations Regarding Family Separation Issues Under the Zero Tolerance Policy — DHS Office of Inspector General
  6. USA: 'You Don't Have Any Rights Here' — Illegal Pushbacks, Arbitrary Detention, and Ill-Treatment of Asylum-Seekers — Amnesty International
  7. Department of Justice Inspector General Report on Family Separation — Department of Justice Office of Inspector General

How this record was published

Manually curated This entry was added directly and does not carry an automated audit trail.

About our editorial methodology →

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Zero Tolerance Family Separation: 5,500+ Children Separated at the Border

    The zero tolerance policy was the direct cause of mass family separations: parents were referred for criminal prosecution, children were taken to Office of Refugee Resettlement shelters, and the two systems — criminal justice and child welfare — did not have adequate mechanisms to track and reunite families. Senior administration officials including Chief of Staff John Kelly had discussed using family separation as a deterrent as early as 2017. Trump publicly and repeatedly denied a family separation policy existed while it was operating. A federal court ordered family reunification; the government struggled to comply, partly because adequate records had not been kept linking children to parents.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Family Separation Continuation: Violating Federal Court Orders to Reunify Families

    A federal judge in the ACLU's Ms. L. v. ICE case ordered the government to reunify all separated families within 30 days. The administration missed the deadline, admitted it lacked a tracking system, and was repeatedly held in contempt. Parents were deported without their children; children were 'lost' in the system; in some cases children remained in U.S. custody for years after their parents had been removed to their home countries. The ACLU's family tracking project located hundreds of deported parents who didn't know where their children were.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Children in Cages: CBP Overcrowding, Freezing Cells, and Documented Child Deaths

    The CBP Border Patrol stations along the southern border were designed for 72-hour holding. Under the Trump administration's enforcement surge, they held children for days and weeks, sometimes in chainlink-fenced areas — the 'cages' — without adequate food, water, sleep, or sanitation. At least seven children died in custody in fiscal years 2018-2019, compared to zero in the previous decade. The DHS OIG described conditions presenting 'immediate risk' to detainee health and safety.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Tender Age Shelters: Separating and Warehousing Infants and Toddlers

    While the Zero Tolerance policy is documented elsewhere, the specific treatment of children under 5 — the 'tender age' population — constituted a distinct category of harm. Infants as young as a few months old were taken from parents and placed in facilities where they were cared for by strangers. Whistleblowers described children crying inconsolably. The American Academy of Pediatrics called the policy 'child abuse.' A federal court gave the government 30 days to reunify this group; the administration missed the deadline.