Reading mode Exit reading mode

Children in Detention: Overcrowded Border Facilities and Humanitarian Conditions

The DHS Inspector General's July 2019 report documented conditions at Border Patrol facilities in El Paso, Texas: some detainees held for over a month in single-occupancy holding rooms, standing room only conditions, limited access to showers and clean clothing, insufficient food, and inadequate medical care. The Clint facility conditions, documented by attorneys visiting to conduct interviews, included children sleeping on floors, a 2-year-old with dirty clothes, limited access to soap and toothbrushes, and sick children not separated from healthy ones. The administration's response was that the facilities were overwhelmed by a surge in arrivals and that Congress needed to provide additional funding.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

Systematic actions that undermine fundamental constitutional or international legal protections at the structural level. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
El Paso, TX / Clint, TX
Legal posture
Reported
War-crime classification
Probable
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
No
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-children-cages-immigration-detention
Victims
Hundreds of children detained for weeks in conditions the DHS Inspector General found did not meet minimum care standards; children without access to adequate food, hygiene, or medical care
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President; administration's enforcement priorities created conditions leading to overcrowding; rejected additional humanitarian funding initially— White House
  • Kevin McAleenan, CBP Commissioner, then acting DHS Secretary; oversaw facilities during documented period— U.S. Customs and Border Protection / DHS

Key points

  • The DHS Inspector General's July 2019 management alert documented conditions at El Paso Border Patrol facilities: one holding cell designed for 35 adults contained 155 adults; some detainees had been held for over 30 days in facilities designed for 72-hour maximum holds
  • At the Clint, Texas facility in June 2019, attorneys visiting to conduct legal interviews documented 250 children in a facility designed for 104; conditions described included: children sleeping on concrete floors, 2-year-olds without clean diapers, sick children not separated from healthy ones, children without access to toothbrushes, soap, and showers
  • Physicians and medical professionals who visited the facilities reported children with flu, lice, varicella, and other contagious illnesses without adequate medical care; the American Academy of Pediatrics documented the conditions as harmful to child development and health
  • The administration's initial response was that the conditions resulted from an overwhelming surge in crossings rather than policy failures, and that Congress needed to provide emergency supplemental funding; Congress passed a $4.6 billion emergency supplemental in June 2019 to address the conditions
  • The images and accounts from Clint and other facilities generated significant public and political attention; the term 'children in cages' referred specifically to chain-link enclosures used as holding areas within detention facilities, documented in photographs
  • A separate ACLU report and multiple congressional investigations found that the family separation policy's poor record-keeping had made reunification difficult and in some cases impossible, and that some children had been transferred to facilities where staff had criminal records that had not been screened

Overview

The DHS's own Inspector General documented dangerous overcrowding in Border Patrol facilities holding children: 250 children in a facility designed for 104, children on concrete floors, sick children not separated from healthy ones, inadequate access to soap and food. This was not disputed. It was in the government's own report.

The administration's position was that it had been overwhelmed by a surge. The Inspector General's position was that the conditions were dangerous regardless of the cause.

Clint, Texas

The Clint, Texas facility became the focal point because immigration attorneys who visited to conduct legal interviews provided specific, documented accounts: a 2-year-old without clean diapers, teenagers managing toddlers because there were not enough adults, flu spreading through the facility without adequate medical response, children sleeping on concrete floors under mylar sheets.

The attorneys could not compel the government to act. They could document what they saw.

The term "children in cages" referred to chain-link holding areas photographed within Border Patrol facilities. The administration initially claimed the photographs were from the Obama era (some were; some were from the Trump era). The DHS's own records confirmed children were held in these structures under the Trump administration.

The Inspector General's Finding

The DHS Inspector General is a federal official whose job is to document and report government failures. Their management alert — the government's own internal assessment — found dangerous overcrowding, prolonged detention in facilities designed for 72-hour holds, and conditions that did not meet minimum care standards.

The alert was titled "DHS Needs to Address Dangerous Overcrowding and Prolonged Detention of Children and Adults."

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Convention on the Rights of the ChildArticle 37Children deprived of liberty shall be treated with humanity and in a manner which takes into account the needs of persons of their age; detention conditions violating minimum standards for child welfare
International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsArticle 10All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person

Update log

  1. Updated with continued reporting on facility conditions.

Sequence of events

  1. Surge in border crossings strains detention capacity

    A surge in asylum-seeking families and unaccompanied minors overwhelms Border Patrol holding capacity. Administration characterizes it as a crisis requiring additional resources.

  2. Attorneys document Clint, Texas conditions

    Immigration attorneys visiting Clint, Texas to interview detained children document 250 children in a facility designed for 104, with inadequate food, hygiene, and medical care. Their accounts are published nationally.

  3. DHS Inspector General issues management alert

    DHS OIG issues a management alert finding 'dangerous overcrowding' and prolonged detention of children and adults at El Paso Border Patrol facilities, documenting conditions violating minimum care standards.

  4. Congress passes $4.6 billion emergency supplemental

    Congress passes a $4.6 billion emergency humanitarian supplemental to address detention conditions. The funds are directed to food, medical care, and alternative detention programs.

  5. Continued reporting on facility conditions

    Investigative reporting and inspector general reports continue documenting substandard conditions at immigration detention facilities; the DHS OIG issues additional reports finding persistent deficiencies.

Sources

  1. Hungry, Scared and Sick: Inside the Border Patrol Detention of Migrant Children — The New York Times
  2. DHS watchdog finds 'dangerous' overcrowding at some Border Patrol stations — The Washington Post
  3. AP analysis: CBP holding more than 2,500 children as inspector general reports dangerous conditions — The Associated Press
  4. DHS OIG — Management Alert: DHS Needs to Address Dangerous Overcrowding and Prolonged Detention of Children and Adults in the Rio Grande Valley — DHS Office of Inspector General

How this record was published

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Zero Tolerance Family Separation: 5,500+ Children Separated at the Border

    The zero tolerance policy was the direct cause of mass family separations: parents were referred for criminal prosecution, children were taken to Office of Refugee Resettlement shelters, and the two systems — criminal justice and child welfare — did not have adequate mechanisms to track and reunite families. Senior administration officials including Chief of Staff John Kelly had discussed using family separation as a deterrent as early as 2017. Trump publicly and repeatedly denied a family separation policy existed while it was operating. A federal court ordered family reunification; the government struggled to comply, partly because adequate records had not been kept linking children to parents.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Children in Cages: CBP Overcrowding, Freezing Cells, and Documented Child Deaths

    The CBP Border Patrol stations along the southern border were designed for 72-hour holding. Under the Trump administration's enforcement surge, they held children for days and weeks, sometimes in chainlink-fenced areas — the 'cages' — without adequate food, water, sleep, or sanitation. At least seven children died in custody in fiscal years 2018-2019, compared to zero in the previous decade. The DHS OIG described conditions presenting 'immediate risk' to detainee health and safety.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Zero Tolerance Family Separation: Systematic Removal of Children from Asylum-Seeking Parents

    Attorney General Sessions announced a zero tolerance policy in April 2018 requiring criminal prosecution of all illegal border crossers. Because federal criminal custody excludes children, this automatically separated minors from their parents. Over 5,500 children were separated in six weeks. Courts ordered reunification; as of 2024, hundreds of families remain separated.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    MS-13 'Animals' and Dehumanizing Rhetoric: Using Gang Labels to Target Immigrant Communities

    Trump's use of 'animals' to describe MS-13 members — and his conflation of the gang label with immigrants broadly — followed the same pattern documented in incitement to ethnic violence: dehumanization of a group, followed by calls for harsh treatment. Scholars of political violence noted the specific language echoed anti-Tutsi propaganda before the Rwandan genocide and Nazi propaganda before the Holocaust. Trump used similar dehumanizing framing for other immigrant groups, describing Central American migrants as an 'infestation' and an 'invasion.'