Reading mode Exit reading mode

Tender Age Shelters: Separating and Warehousing Infants and Toddlers

While the Zero Tolerance policy is documented elsewhere, the specific treatment of children under 5 — the 'tender age' population — constituted a distinct category of harm. Infants as young as a few months old were taken from parents and placed in facilities where they were cared for by strangers. Whistleblowers described children crying inconsolably. The American Academy of Pediatrics called the policy 'child abuse.' A federal court gave the government 30 days to reunify this group; the administration missed the deadline.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

Conduct that satisfies the legal elements of a war crime under the Rome Statute (Article 8), a crime against humanity (Article 7), or genocide (Article 6). Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Southwest Key tender age shelters; nationwide HHS/ORR facilities
Legal posture
Judicial finding
War-crime classification
Confirmed
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
Yes
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-children-separation-tender-age
Victims
Children under 5 forcibly separated from their parents under Zero Tolerance, including infants; parents separated from their young children, unable to communicate their whereabouts
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President of the United States— White House
  • Jeff Sessions, Attorney General; announced Zero Tolerance— Department of Justice
  • Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security; said she was 'not aware' of tender age shelters— DHS

Key points

  • The AP exclusively reported on 'tender age' shelters in Texas in June 2018 — facilities holding young migrant children ages newborn through 5 who had been separated from their parents under Zero Tolerance
  • ProPublica published audio recording of children at a CBP holding facility crying and asking for their parents; the audio, obtained from inside the facility, included a Salvadoran child crying 'Papá! Papá!' repeatedly
  • DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen initially said at a press briefing she was 'not aware' of tender age shelters — a claim the AP reporting directly contradicted
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics called the policy 'child abuse' and warned of lasting developmental, psychological, and neurological harm from early childhood parent separation
  • A federal court gave the administration 30 days to reunify children under 5 with their parents; as of the deadline, 103 children under 5 had not been reunified — the government attributed some to parental criminal records or parental deportation, categories the court did not exempt
  • Several children separated as infants or toddlers experienced years of separation; the Biden administration continued searching for parents years later

Overview

The Zero Tolerance family separation policy is documented separately. This entry addresses a specific and especially grave dimension of that policy: the separation of infants and young toddlers from their parents — children for whom separation from a primary caregiver at a critical developmental stage causes the most severe and lasting harm.

The administration did not exempt young children from the separation policy. There was no minimum age. Infants as young as a few months old were taken from their mothers or fathers and placed in facilities staffed by strangers.

The Tender Age Shelters

The Associated Press reported on June 18, 2018 — the same week Trump signed the executive order purportedly ending separations — that facilities in South Texas were holding babies and young children who had been separated from their parents. The shelters were not equipped or designed for infant care in the way a family or foster home would be. Staff described children who could not be comforted, who cried constantly, who could not understand where their parents were.

The ProPublica audio, released the same week, put sound to the images: migrant children at CBP facilities sobbing for their parents. A Salvadoran child crying "Papá" again and again. The audio became the most-shared piece of media coverage of the Zero Tolerance crisis.

The Medical Warning

The American Academy of Pediatrics — the nation's leading authority on children's health — was categorical. The policy was child abuse. Parent-child separation in early childhood disrupts the neurological and psychological development of children in ways that research shows are lasting. The earlier the separation and the longer its duration, the more severe the damage.

The administration continued the policy after receiving the AAP's warning. It was not an inadvertent harm — it was a foreseeable harm the administration chose to inflict.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Convention on the Rights of the ChildArticles 3, 7, 8, 9Best interests of the child as primary consideration; right to family unity; deliberate separation of infants from parents as a deterrent policy is not in any child's best interests and violates the CRC
Convention Against TortureArticle 16Forcible separation of infants from their parents constitutes cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment for both the child and the parent
Rome Statute of the International Criminal CourtArticle 7(1)(d)Forcible transfer of population as a crime against humanity — the systematic separation and transfer of children from their families meets the definition when conducted as part of a widespread state policy

Update log

  1. Updated with post-deadline reunification status.

Sequence of events

  1. Zero Tolerance announced

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions announces Zero Tolerance — directing CBP to refer all illegal border crossers for criminal prosecution, which automatically triggers family separation because children cannot be held in adult detention facilities.

  2. AP reports on tender age shelters

    The Associated Press exclusively reports on 'tender age' shelters in South Texas holding babies and young children under 5 who have been separated from their parents. Staff at the facilities describe children who cannot be comforted and who cry for their parents constantly.

  3. ProPublica audio published

    ProPublica publishes audio from inside a CBP holding facility of migrant children crying for their parents. The audio, including a Salvadoran child crying 'Papá' repeatedly, becomes one of the defining documents of the Zero Tolerance crisis.

  4. Nielsen: 'not aware' of tender age shelters

    At a press briefing, DHS Secretary Nielsen says she is 'not aware' of tender age shelters — a statement immediately contradicted by the AP reporting and widely called false. Nielsen also says 'we don't have a policy of separating families at the border' — a claim contradicted by the Zero Tolerance announcement.

  5. Trump signs order ostensibly ending separation

    Under intense political pressure, Trump signs an executive order purporting to end family separation. The order does not address tender age children already separated.

  6. Court deadline: 103 children under 5 not yet reunified

    The court's 30-day deadline for reunifying children under 5 passes. The government reports it has reunified 57 of the 103 children in the under-5 group identified by the government, but disputes whether all 103 meet the court's criteria for reunification — a dispute the court largely rejects.

Sources

  1. AP Exclusive: US held migrant kids in 'tender age' shelters — The Associated Press
  2. U.S. Is Holding Migrant Babies in 'Tender Age' Shelters — The New York Times
  3. AAP Calls Family Separation 'Child Abuse' — American Academy of Pediatrics archived ✓
  4. Listen to Children Who've Just Been Separated From Their Parents at the Border — ProPublica

How this record was published

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Family Separation Continuation: Violating Federal Court Orders to Reunify Families

    A federal judge in the ACLU's Ms. L. v. ICE case ordered the government to reunify all separated families within 30 days. The administration missed the deadline, admitted it lacked a tracking system, and was repeatedly held in contempt. Parents were deported without their children; children were 'lost' in the system; in some cases children remained in U.S. custody for years after their parents had been removed to their home countries. The ACLU's family tracking project located hundreds of deported parents who didn't know where their children were.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Zero Tolerance Family Separation: Systematic Removal of Children from Asylum-Seeking Parents

    Attorney General Sessions announced a zero tolerance policy in April 2018 requiring criminal prosecution of all illegal border crossers. Because federal criminal custody excludes children, this automatically separated minors from their parents. Over 5,500 children were separated in six weeks. Courts ordered reunification; as of 2024, hundreds of families remain separated.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Zero Tolerance Family Separation: 5,500+ Children Separated at the Border

    The zero tolerance policy was the direct cause of mass family separations: parents were referred for criminal prosecution, children were taken to Office of Refugee Resettlement shelters, and the two systems — criminal justice and child welfare — did not have adequate mechanisms to track and reunite families. Senior administration officials including Chief of Staff John Kelly had discussed using family separation as a deterrent as early as 2017. Trump publicly and repeatedly denied a family separation policy existed while it was operating. A federal court ordered family reunification; the government struggled to comply, partly because adequate records had not been kept linking children to parents.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Children in Cages: CBP Overcrowding, Freezing Cells, and Documented Child Deaths

    The CBP Border Patrol stations along the southern border were designed for 72-hour holding. Under the Trump administration's enforcement surge, they held children for days and weeks, sometimes in chainlink-fenced areas — the 'cages' — without adequate food, water, sleep, or sanitation. At least seven children died in custody in fiscal years 2018-2019, compared to zero in the previous decade. The DHS OIG described conditions presenting 'immediate risk' to detainee health and safety.