Reporting thread

Institutional dismantlement and oversight destruction

The systematic gutting of federal agencies, oversight mechanisms, and institutional capacity, from USAID to FEMA to the inspector general system.

12 records · Last updated March 26, 2026

These records show how the elimination of oversight creates the conditions for the violations documented elsewhere in this archive.

Download evidence bundle (JSON) Printable dossier

Included records

Scan the dossier

Updated March 26, 2026 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Reported record

DOGE Employees Matched Social Security Data with Voter Rolls to Pursue Voter Fraud Claims

DOGE employees at SSA secretly worked with a political advocacy group to match Social Security data with voter rolls to find 'evidence of voter fraud and to overturn election results.' A signed data-sharing agreement and Hatch Act referrals followed. A whistleblower alleged DOGE copied 300+ million Americans' records into an unsecured virtual database.

  • In March 2025, a political advocacy group — believed to be True the Vote — contacted DOGE employees at SSA with a request to analyze state voter rolls, with the stated aim of finding 'evidence of voter fraud and to overturn election results in certain States.'
  • One DOGE team member signed a 'Voter Data Agreement' with the advocacy group on March 24, 2025, in his capacity as an SSA employee, without authorization from SSA leadership.
  • Beginning March 7, 2025, DOGE team members used Cloudflare — a third-party server not approved for SSA data — to share data outside SSA's security protocols.
Sources
10
Documents
2
Updates
0
DOGESocial Securityvoter fraudvoter rolls
Updated March 26, 2026 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Judicial finding

DOGE Unauthorized Access to Treasury, OPM, and Social Security Databases

DOGE accessed Treasury, OPM, and SSA databases containing millions of Americans' personal data without authorization or completed background checks. Federal judges ordered data disgorged and deleted, finding Privacy Act and APA violations, though the Supreme Court later partially reversed.

  • DOGE staff were granted access to Treasury's central payment system (handling trillions in tax refunds, Social Security benefits, and veterans' benefits), OPM personnel databases, and SSA systems containing Americans' most sensitive personal data.
  • A federal judge found DOGE staffers were given access before background checks were completed or inter-agency detail agreements were finalized, violating the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.
  • A court ordered DOGE to disgorge and delete all non-anonymized personal information obtained from SSA systems — the first 'disgorge' order of its kind against a federal entity.
Sources
12
Documents
2
Updates
0
DOGEElon Muskdata privacyPrivacy Act
Updated March 26, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Judicial finding

DOGE-Directed Mass Firings and Forced Resignations of Federal Workers

DOGE directed mass firings of probationary employees, coerced ~75,000 resignations through the 'Fork in the Road' program, and orchestrated reductions in force totaling ~300,000 federal positions. Courts found the probationary firings illegal, but the Supreme Court sided with the administration on appeal.

  • On January 28, 2025, OPM sent the 'Fork in the Road' email — modeled on Elon Musk's Twitter layoffs — offering federal employees paid leave through September 30 if they resigned by February 6. Approximately 75,000 accepted under pressure.
  • On February 14 ('Valentine's Day Massacre'), DOGE directed agencies to fire nearly 25,000 probationary employees, many falsely labeled as poor performers, across the VA, DOE, EPA, Interior, and other agencies.
  • Federal Judge William Alsup ordered reinstatement of thousands of fired workers, calling the OPM directive a 'sham.' The Supreme Court reversed on April 8, siding with the administration.
Sources
10
Documents
1
Updates
0
DOGEElon Muskfederal workforcemass layoffs
Updated March 26, 2026 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern Ongoing Judicial finding

DOGE Associates Gained Access to $6 Trillion Treasury Payment System

DOGE associates including Tom Krause (Broadcom executive) and Marko Elez (25-year-old with racist posts) accessed Treasury's $6 trillion payment system. Elez was mistakenly given write access to payment records. 19 AGs sued. A federal judge blocked access, calling it 'chaotic and haphazard,' but the 4th Circuit later reversed.

  • DOGE associates were granted access to the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which processes over $6 trillion in annual payments including tax refunds, Social Security benefits, veterans' benefits, and federal salaries.
  • Tom Krause, former Broadcom CFO and current CEO of Cloud Service Group, was made an unpaid 'senior advisor for technology and modernization' at Treasury. Marko Elez, a 25-year-old engineer, began working as a Treasury employee on January 21.
  • Elez was mistakenly given 'write' access — data-editing privileges — to a sensitive Treasury payments database. The error was discovered and revoked after one day, but it demonstrated the chaotic nature of access controls.
Sources
11
Documents
1
Updates
0
DOGETreasurypayment systemElon Musk
Updated March 26, 2026 Civil Rights
Major Abuse of Power Ongoing Reported record

DOGE-Directed Elimination of Federal DEI Programs and Mass Firings of DEI Workers

Executive Order 14151 directed elimination of all federal DEI programs. DOGE implemented a three-phase purge, firing thousands of workers — including many who had no current DEI role — using AI tools to identify targets. A December 2025 class-action lawsuit alleges the purge targeted minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ employees.

  • Executive Order 14151, signed January 20, 2025, directed agencies to terminate all DEI offices, positions, equity action plans, DEI-related grants and contracts, and DEI performance requirements within 60 days.
  • OPM gave agencies until noon on January 23 — just three days — to report all DEIA offices, employees, and contractors, and to develop written plans for reduction-in-force actions.
  • DOGE implemented a three-phase playbook: Phase 1 (Day 1) rescinded all DEI executive orders and dissolved offices; Phase 2 placed employees on leave and compiled termination lists; Phase 3 executed the firings.
Sources
9
Documents
2
Updates
0
DOGEDEIexecutive ordercivil rights
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Active litigation

Schedule F Reclassification: Mass Removal of Civil Service Protections

Schedule F reclassification targets 50,000 federal employees for removal of civil service protections, enabling political firing for 'subversion of presidential directives.' The rule strips appeal rights, whistleblower protections, and Merit Systems Protection Board access, drawing lawsuits from over 30 organizations.

  • Approximately 50,000 federal employees (2% of the federal workforce) will be reclassified into 'Schedule Policy/Career,' losing civil service protections including appeal rights and whistleblower protections.
  • The final rule removes statutory whistleblower protections and prevents workers from appealing their reclassification to the Merit Systems Protection Board, eliminating key accountability mechanisms.
  • Employees can be 'swiftly removed' for 'subversion of presidential directives' — a vague standard that could encompass any disagreement with administration policy, scientific findings, or legal advice.
Sources
8
Documents
2
Updates
0
Schedule Fcivil servicefederal workforcewhistleblower protections
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
War Crime / Crime Against Humanity Ongoing Official executive action

Systematic Dismantlement of USAID and Global Humanitarian Consequences

Systematic destruction of the US Agency for International Development resulted in termination of lifesaving programs across the developing world, with The Lancet projecting 9.4 million additional preventable deaths by 2030.

  • The Lancet projects 9.4 million additional deaths by 2030 as a direct result of the USAID dismantlement, making this potentially the single largest humanitarian consequence of any single administrative action.
  • 23 million children lost access to education and 95 million people lost access to basic healthcare when USAID programs were terminated.
  • HIV clinics were closed in South Africa, medical programs terminated in Afghanistan, mobile health teams in conflict areas suspended, and cash payment programs halted -- affecting the most vulnerable populations globally.
Sources
4
Documents
2
Updates
0
USAIDhumanitarianglobal healthdevelopment aid
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Official executive action

FEMA Dismantlement — Budget Cuts, Mass Layoffs, and Destruction of Disaster Response Capacity

A systematic effort to dismantle federal disaster preparedness and response capacity through budget cuts, mass layoffs, program terminations, and structural reorganization. FEMA's workforce has already shrunk by one-third, with plans to cut it in half. The disaster response workforce faces a 41% cut and the surge workforce an 85% cut, leaving the country dangerously unprepared for hurricanes, wildfires, earthquakes, and other disasters.

  • FEMA's workforce shrank from approximately 29,000 to 23,000 in 2025 — a loss of one-third of its staff since Trump's second term began.
  • The proposed FY2026 budget cuts FEMA by $646 million. Plans call for a 50% total workforce reduction, a 41% disaster response staff cut, and an 85% cut to the surge workforce that deploys after major disasters.
  • CORE (Cadre of On-Call Response/Recovery Employees) staff received non-renewal notices on New Year's Eve 2025, effective in the first days of January 2026.
Sources
8
Documents
0
Updates
0
FEMAdisaster preparednessfederal dismantlementbudget cuts
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Major Abuse of Power Ongoing Official executive action

US Withdrawal from the World Health Organization — Dismantling Global Pandemic Preparedness

The US withdrew from the WHO effective January 2026, removing the organization's largest funder and dismantling pandemic preparedness infrastructure. The WHO announced plans to cut 2,300 jobs — 25% of its workforce. The withdrawal degrades global disease surveillance, influenza vaccine matching, and outbreak response capacity at a time of ongoing zoonotic disease threats.

  • Trump signed Executive Order 14155 on January 20, 2025, initiating US withdrawal from the WHO. The withdrawal became effective on January 22, 2026.
  • The US was the WHO's largest single funder, responsible for 22% of mandatory contributions during 2024-2025. The WHO's most recent two-year budget is $6.8 billion.
  • The loss of US funding forced the WHO to announce plans to cut approximately 2,300 jobs — a quarter of its entire workforce — by summer 2026.
Sources
8
Documents
0
Updates
0
WHOWorld Health Organizationpandemic preparednessglobal health
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Official executive action

Systematic Destruction of Environmental Protections — Paris Agreement, UNFCCC, and Endangerment Finding

An unprecedented withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, UNFCCC, and IPCC, combined with the rescission of the endangerment finding and rollback of 31+ environmental rules, constitutes the most comprehensive destruction of environmental protections in US history. The actions remove the world's largest historical emitter from the international climate framework while eliminating domestic regulation of greenhouse gases.

  • On January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the US from the Paris Agreement and directing withdrawal from broader climate commitments.
  • In January 2026, the administration announced withdrawal from the UNFCCC and IPCC — plus 64 other international organizations — an unprecedented exit from the entire international climate architecture.
  • The EPA rescinded the 2009 endangerment finding that greenhouse gas emissions threaten public health, removing the legal foundation for all federal greenhouse gas regulation.
Sources
8
Documents
0
Updates
0
Paris AgreementUNFCCCIPCCclimate change
Updated March 25, 2026 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Official executive action

Dismantlement of Whistleblower Protections and Government Oversight Infrastructure

Systematic destruction of the government oversight apparatus: 17 inspectors general fired, heads of the Office of Special Counsel and Office of Government Ethics removed, whistleblower retaliation cases up 9x at DOE, and federal employees reporting fear of speaking up or reporting wrongdoing.

  • Trump fired 17 inspectors general upon returning to office in January 2025, removing the independent watchdogs responsible for detecting fraud, waste, and abuse across the executive branch. The firings violated the Inspector General Act's requirement of 30-day advance notice to Congress.
  • The heads of both the Office of Special Counsel (which protects whistleblowers from retaliation) and the Office of Government Ethics (which oversees ethics compliance) were fired in February 2025, eliminating the two agencies most directly responsible for protecting federal employees who report wrongdoing.
  • Whistleblower retaliation cases at the Department of Energy increased 9x: the DOE IG opened 45 whistleblower-retaliation investigations in FY2025, compared to 5 in the previous year — a 900% increase.
Sources
6
Documents
1
Updates
0
whistleblowersinspectors generaloversightOffice of Special Counsel
Updated September 25, 2025 Federal Dismantlement
Serious Rights Violation Ongoing Judicial finding

Mass Firing of Inspectors General Across Federal Government

Trump fired at least 17 inspectors general across the federal government without the advance notice to Congress that the Inspector General Act generally requires, and a later federal ruling said the notice failure violated the statute.

  • At least 17 inspectors general were removed in a single sweep across multiple agencies.
  • The Inspector General Act generally requires notice to Congress before removal.
  • A later district-court ruling found the notice failure unlawful but left reinstatement unresolved.
Sources
5
Documents
0
Updates
2
inspectors generaloversightfederal dismantlementcongressional notice