Major Abuse of Power

NDAs and Employee Silencing: Systematic Use of Non-Disclosure Agreements

Trump's NDA culture predated the presidency. Former Trump Organization employees described comprehensive NDAs covering all aspects of their employment. The campaign NDAs were drafted by Trump's attorneys and covered staffers, volunteers, and contractors. Several current and former employees who spoke to journalists anonymously or were approached by journalists described fear of legal action as the primary reason they declined to speak on the record. Michael Cohen's 'catch and kill' operation with AMI (American Media Inc.) extended the silencing mechanism to women who alleged sexual misconduct. Omarosa Manigault Newman, a former White House employee, claimed she was pressured to sign an NDA after her departure that would have prohibited any public criticism of Trump.

Overview

The purpose of a non-disclosure agreement is to prevent information from becoming public. Trump used them systematically — in his business, in his campaign, and then in an unprecedented attempt to extend the practice to government employees whose work is funded by taxpayers.

When the information NDAs prevent from becoming public is evidence of misconduct, the mechanism shifts from legal protection of confidential business information to suppression of accountability.

The Campaign

When Trump announced his presidential candidacy, everyone who came to work for the campaign signed an NDA. This covered not just business processes or confidential campaign strategy — it covered personal observations of Trump himself. The agreements were broad enough that campaign staff who observed conduct they found troubling were legally bound to stay silent.

Candidates for the highest office in the country were systematically insulating themselves from accountability by contract.

The White House

Trump attempted to extend the practice to the White House. Legal experts said government employees — whose work is public service, funded by taxpayers, conducted in the public interest — could not legally be bound by NDAs that prevented them from discussing that work. The attempt was described as unprecedented.

The attempt says something about how Trump understood the presidency: as a private enterprise where employees could be silenced like the housekeeper at Mar-a-Lago.

The Catch and Kill Context

The NDAs used in the catch-and-kill arrangements with women who alleged sexual misconduct were deployed alongside payments — a more comprehensive silencing mechanism. Sign an NDA and take money, or face a legal battle against Trump's attorneys. The agreements were designed to be practical coercion regardless of enforceability.

The underlying claims — what the women would have said without the NDAs — were the information the system was designed to prevent from reaching voters before elections.

Timeline

Sequence of events

  1. Trump Organization systematic NDA use — employees required to sign

    Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Trump Organization employees are required to sign comprehensive non-disclosure agreements covering their observations of Trump personally and his business operations. The practice extends to contractors, vendors, and personal staff.

  2. Campaign staff NDAs — all staff required to sign

    When Trump announces his presidential campaign, all campaign staff — from senior advisers to volunteers — are required to sign NDAs. The agreements are broader than standard confidentiality agreements, covering personal observations of Trump.

  3. Stormy Daniels NDA executed — $130K payment

    Michael Cohen executes an NDA with Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford) through Essential Consultants LLC, accompanied by a $130,000 payment, prohibiting her from discussing her alleged sexual encounter with Trump. (Documented separately in the hush money conviction file.)

  4. Omarosa refuses NDA — publishes memoir

    Omarosa Manigault Newman refuses a $15,000/month consulting contract contingent on signing an NDA prohibiting public criticism of Trump. She publishes a memoir about her White House experience. Trump responds with personal attacks.

  5. NYT: Trump sought White House staff NDAs

    The New York Times reports that Trump sought to require White House staff — government employees — to sign NDAs. Legal experts say such agreements would be unprecedented and of questionable enforceability for employees in public service roles.

Sources

  1. Trump Sought to Force White House Aides to Sign Nondisclosure Agreements — The New York Times
  2. Trump's use of NDAs to silence critics and employees — The Washington Post
  3. Trump's NDA culture: silencing employees and associates — The Associated Press

Verification

Publication provenance

Related records

Updated June 1, 2012 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Major Abuse of Power

Trump SoHo: Fraud Investigation, Investor Losses, DA Charges Dropped

Trump SoHo buyers, including an investor group led by Sateesh Bhagat, discovered that marketing materials claiming 60% of units were sold were false — fewer than 15% had been sold. They sued for …

Sources
4
Updated November 18, 2016 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Major Abuse of Power

Trump University: Fraud Settlement After Defrauding Students of $40 Million

Trump University was not a real university — it had no degree programs, no accreditation, and was not approved to use the word 'university' in New York. Students paid from $1,495 for a preview seminar …

Sources
4