Reading mode Exit reading mode

Net Neutrality Repeal: FCC Rollback of Open Internet Protections

Net neutrality rules prevented ISPs from discriminating between different types of internet traffic — from blocking competitors' services, throttling streaming video, or creating 'fast lanes' for content providers willing to pay. The Trump FCC repeal removed those protections, reclassifying broadband as an information service rather than a utility. States including California passed their own net neutrality rules; the legal status remained contested through Trump's first term.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

Executive actions that exceed constitutional authority, circumvent statutory constraints, or weaponize government institutions for political ends. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Washington, D.C.
Category
Rule of Law
Legal posture
Executive action
War-crime classification
Enabling conduct
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
No
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-net-neutrality-fcc-rollback
Victims
Internet users who face throttled or blocked content; small businesses and startups that depend on equal access to compete with established players; low-income households dependent on affordable internet access
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President of the United States; appointed Ajit Pai to FCC chairmanship— White House
  • Ajit Pai, FCC Chairman; led the net neutrality repeal— Federal Communications Commission

Key points

  • The 2015 net neutrality rules required ISPs to treat all internet traffic equally — not blocking, throttling, or creating paid 'fast lanes' for certain content — and classified broadband as a utility under Title II of the Communications Act
  • Pai, appointed FCC chairman by Trump, characterized the 2015 rules as 'heavy-handed' regulation and argued that removing them would increase investment; critics noted investment in broadband infrastructure had increased under the rules
  • The repeal allowed ISPs to legally throttle, block, or charge more for specific content — raising the possibility of, for example, Comcast-owned NBC content loading faster than competing streaming services on Comcast's network
  • Multiple states passed their own net neutrality rules after the federal repeal, most notably California; the Trump administration sued California to block its rules, claiming federal preemption
  • The Senate voted 52-47 in May 2018 to restore net neutrality under the Congressional Review Act, but the House did not pass the resolution before the end of the Congress
  • Biden's FCC ultimately moved to restore net neutrality in 2024 — after a seven-year gap in federal open internet protections

Overview

Net neutrality is the principle that your internet service provider must treat all internet traffic equally — that Comcast cannot make NBC content load faster than Netflix, that Verizon cannot throttle YouTube while promoting its own video service, that AT&T cannot block access to a VoIP service that competes with its own phone business.

The Trump FCC repealed those protections in December 2017.

Why It Matters

The internet's architecture of open access has been the foundation of its economic and cultural power. Startups can compete with established companies because their packets travel at the same speed. Small media outlets reach readers without paying for premium delivery. The absence of gatekeeping has been essential to the internet's role as a platform for free expression.

Net neutrality rules existed because ISPs have strong business incentives to become gatekeepers. Without rules, Comcast — which owns NBC Universal — can rationally charge more for Netflix's traffic, which competes with Comcast's own Peacock service. AT&T can promote its DirecTV subsidiary's streaming service by throttling competitors.

The Repeal's Defenders

Pai argued that the 2015 rules chilled investment in broadband infrastructure by subjecting it to utility-style regulation. The data did not support this: broadband investment had increased in the years the rules were in effect, and multiple major ISPs had publicly told investors the rules had not affected their capital expenditure plans.

The repeal was, at its core, a transfer of power from users to ISPs — removing the legal requirement that ISPs provide the equal access that users depended on and that had enabled the open internet's growth.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsArticle 19Right to freedom of expression includes the right to seek, receive, and impart information — allowing ISPs to discriminate between internet traffic can impede this right

Update log

  1. Updated with effective date of repeal.

Sequence of events

  1. FCC votes 3-2 to repeal net neutrality

    The Trump FCC votes along party lines to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, reclassifying broadband from a Title II utility to a Title I information service and removing the equal treatment requirements.

  2. Senate votes to restore net neutrality

    The Senate votes 52-47 to restore net neutrality under the Congressional Review Act — the first bipartisan CRA vote in the Senate. The House fails to hold a comparable vote before the end of the Congress.

  3. Repeal takes effect

    The net neutrality repeal officially takes effect. ISPs are no longer legally prohibited from throttling, blocking, or creating paid priority for certain internet traffic.

  4. California passes net neutrality law

    California passes SB 822, the strongest state-level net neutrality law in the country. The Trump administration immediately sues to block it, arguing federal law preempts state regulation.

Sources

  1. FCC Repeals Net Neutrality Rules — The New York Times
  2. The FCC just voted to repeal net neutrality — The Washington Post
  3. Net neutrality: What it means and why it matters — Electronic Frontier Foundation
  4. FCC net neutrality repeal takes effect — The Associated Press

How this record was published

Manually curated This entry was added directly and does not carry an automated audit trail.

About our editorial methodology →

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Net Neutrality Repeal: FCC Eliminates Open Internet Rules Over Widespread Opposition

    Net neutrality rules required internet service providers to treat all internet traffic equally — not to slow down or block Netflix while favoring their own streaming service, or charge websites for premium delivery. The repeal allowed ISPs to create tiered access to the internet. The FCC's public comment process was flooded with millions of fake comments submitted using stolen identities; the New York attorney general investigated. Pai's arguments that the repeal would increase broadband investment were contradicted by ISPs' own earnings statements and CEO comments to investors.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Trump's COVID Infection: Experimental Treatment While Downplaying Pandemic

    Trump's COVID infection came after months of publicly downplaying the disease, refusing to wear masks, and holding indoor rallies. His treatment at Walter Reed included Regeneron's experimental monoclonal antibody cocktail (not yet FDA-authorized), dexamethasone — a steroid given only to patients with severe COVID per WHO protocols — and supplemental oxygen. His doctor Sean Conley gave contradictory statements about whether Trump had needed supplemental oxygen and on what days his oxygen saturation had dropped. Trump staged a motorcade through COVID patients outside Walter Reed while contagious. Upon returning to the White House, he removed his mask for a photo op while potentially still infectious to staff.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Hatch Act Violations: Using White House and Federal Resources for Campaign Events

    The 2020 Republican National Convention featured events staged at the White House — a building owned by the federal government and maintained with taxpayer funds — in ways that previous administrations of both parties had avoided. The OSC, which enforces the Hatch Act prohibiting federal employees from using their official capacity or government resources for political activity, found multiple violations. Secretary Pompeo's Jerusalem speech was the highest-profile Hatch Act referral; the OSC concluded he had violated the act. Other officials investigated included Kellyanne Conway (previously recommended for removal for Hatch Act violations in 2019). The naturalization ceremony conducted by USCIS Director Cuccinelli at the convention for five new citizens was also reviewed.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    DeJoy USPS Sabotage: Removed Sorting Machines, Slowed Mail Before 2020 Election

    DeJoy's operational changes caused immediate and documented mail delays across the country. The changes were implemented months before the presidential election in which mail-in voting was expected to reach record levels due to COVID. Trump stated publicly that he was blocking Post Office funding to prevent mail-in voting. USPS removed 671 high-speed mail-sorting machines; some were dismantled before DeJoy announced a suspension of the changes in response to congressional and legal pressure. Multiple states sued. The sorting machine removals were not reversed even after the suspension.