Reading mode Exit reading mode

Ivana Trump's Rape Allegation Against Donald Trump — Deposition Testimony

Ivana Trump's deposition account described a violent sexual assault during their marriage: Trump had been infuriated by the pain from a scalp surgery and, Ivana said, tore out her hair, pinned her to the bed, and raped her. The account appeared in Harry Hurt III's 'Lost Tycoon' (1993). Ivana issued a statement walking back the word 'rape,' saying she did not use it in a criminal sense but used the word in an 'emotional, not literal sense.' Trump's attorney Michael Cohen, when the account was reported in the press during the 2016 campaign, threatened a reporter and falsely stated that 'you cannot rape your spouse' — a claim that was wrong under New York law even then.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

Systematic actions that undermine fundamental constitutional or international legal protections at the structural level. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
New York, NY
Category
Civil Rights
Legal posture
Reported
War-crime classification
Enabling conduct
Verification
Cross-referenced
ICC relevance
No
Sources
3 cited
Stable ID
trump-ivana-trump-rape-allegation-deposition
Victims
Ivana Trump (née Zelníčková)
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, Husband; alleged perpetrator— Trump Organization

Key points

  • Ivana Trump gave sworn deposition testimony in 1989 describing a violent sexual assault by Donald Trump during their marriage; the account was included in Harry Hurt III's authorized biography 'Lost Tycoon' (1993)
  • Ivana's account described Trump being enraged after a painful scalp reduction surgery performed by a doctor she had recommended; she said he tore out her hair, held her down, and penetrated her without consent
  • Ivana subsequently issued a statement saying she did not use the word 'rape' in a 'criminal sense' and that her 1993 divorce settlement had included a non-disparagement clause; her original deposition account remained in the record
  • When the Daily Beast republished Ivana's account during the 2016 campaign, Trump's attorney Michael Cohen threatened the reporter and falsely stated that 'you cannot rape your spouse' — marital rape had been illegal in New York since 1984
  • Ivana Trump died in July 2022; she had maintained a largely positive public relationship with Trump in later years and publicly supported his presidential campaigns

Overview

Ivana Trump gave deposition testimony in 1989 describing a violent sexual assault by Donald Trump during their marriage. The account appeared in Harry Hurt III's 1993 biography of Trump. Ivana later issued a statement modifying her characterization of the word she had used — she did not mean "rape" in a "criminal sense," she said — but the original deposition account was in the record.

The Account

Ivana's account described a specific incident. Trump, she said, had been furious after a scalp reduction surgery performed by a doctor she had recommended; the surgery had been painful. In his rage, she described him tearing out her hair, holding her down, and penetrating her without her consent.

The account in Hurt's biography was based on Ivana's deposition testimony. It was not hearsay or secondhand.

The Clarification

Ivana's subsequent statement used careful language. She said she did not use the word "rape" in a "criminal sense" and that she felt "violated" by the experience but had not pressed charges. Her divorce settlement had included a non-disparagement clause.

The clarification did not retract the underlying events she described. It addressed the legal categorization of what she said had happened.

Michael Cohen's Response

When the account was reported during the 2016 campaign, Trump's attorney Michael Cohen contacted a reporter and threatened legal action. He also stated, as a matter of fact, that "you cannot rape your spouse." This was wrong. New York had criminalized marital rape in 1984. Cohen later apologized for the threat.

The false legal claim — that marital rape does not exist — was made by the man who would later plead guilty to federal crimes committed at Trump's direction.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenArticle 2State obligation to eliminate acts of gender-based violence against women; marital rape is not exempted under international human rights law

Update log

  1. Updated with Ivana's clarifying statement.

Sequence of events

  1. Ivana gives deposition testimony

    During divorce proceedings, Ivana gives deposition testimony describing a violent sexual assault by Trump during their marriage. The deposition is later cited in Harry Hurt's biography.

  2. 'Lost Tycoon' published — Ivana issues clarification

    Harry Hurt III publishes 'Lost Tycoon' including Ivana's account. Ivana's attorneys issue a statement on her behalf saying she did not use the word 'rape' in a criminal sense. The divorce settlement included a non-disparagement clause.

  3. Daily Beast republishes account during campaign

    The Daily Beast republishes Ivana's account as Trump rises in polls. Michael Cohen, Trump's attorney, contacts the reporter with threats and makes the legally false claim that spouses cannot rape each other. Cohen later apologizes for the threat.

Sources

  1. Ivana Trump: Donald Trump Raped Me — The Daily Beast
  2. Lost Tycoon and the 1989 rape allegation — The New York Times
  3. Ivana Trump's account and her later clarification — The Washington Post

How this record was published

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    E. Jean Carroll Sexual Assault and Decades of Sexual Misconduct Allegations

    E. Jean Carroll first publicly accused Trump of rape in 2019; the legal case was delayed by Trump's claims of immunity as president. In May 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York's technical definition) and defamation. In January 2024, a second jury awarded $83.3 million in damages for Trump's continuing defamatory statements. Trump called Carroll's account 'a made up Fake story' and said she was 'not my type.'

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA: Documented Sexual Misconduct and Dressing Room Violations

    Trump bragged on the Howard Stern show that he would 'go backstage' before shows and that contestants 'are standing there with no clothes' — and that 'I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant.' Multiple former Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA contestants confirmed the behavior; for the teen pageant, the contestants were as young as 15. Trump's ownership gave him structural access that contestants could not refuse without losing their competition standing.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Trump and Jeffrey Epstein: Decades of Social Ties, Documented Parties, Victim Accounts

    Trump and Epstein were documented social associates from the late 1980s through the mid-2000s. They attended parties together at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate and in Manhattan. In a 2002 New York magazine interview, Trump described Epstein as 'a terrific guy' who enjoyed 'the younger side' of women — a statement that took on significance after Epstein's arrest. Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's primary victims, alleged in court filings that she encountered Trump at events hosted by Epstein. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago around 2004-2005 after Epstein allegedly assaulted the daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member. Acosta, Trump's later Secretary of Labor, was the U.S. Attorney who gave Epstein a controversial 2008 plea deal.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    1973 DOJ Housing Discrimination: Trump and Father Sued for Refusing to Rent to Black Applicants

    The DOJ suit was based on a year-long investigation by the Fair Housing Division, including undercover testers who posed as prospective renters. Black testers were told no apartments were available or were given discouraging treatment; white testers at the same buildings were shown units and given applications. Trump applications were alleged to contain a 'C' code — interpreted as standing for 'colored' — to flag non-white applicants. Trump hired Roy Cohn, who filed a $100 million countersuit against the DOJ (dismissed). The 1975 consent decree required anti-discriminatory practices but did not require Trump to admit wrongdoing. Three years later, the DOJ found Trump Management had violated the decree.