Helsinki Summit: Trump Sided With Putin Over His Own CIA on Election Interference
Last updated
Trump and Putin met privately for approximately two hours with only translators present; there was no U.S. notetaker and Trump reportedly had his interpreter's notes confiscated. At the public press conference, Trump said he didn't 'see any reason why it would be Russia' that interfered in the election — contradicting the unanimous assessment of the U.S. intelligence community. When asked the next day, Trump claimed he had misspoken and meant to say 'wouldn't' instead of 'would.' The statement provoked condemnation from Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican Speaker Paul Ryan, and dozens of Republican members of Congress.
Overview
The U.S. Intelligence Community had concluded with high confidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. The conclusion was bipartisan, unanimous across seventeen agencies, and documented in a formal assessment that had been briefed to the president, members of Congress, and allied governments.
Standing next to Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Trump said he didn't see any reason why it would be Russia.
What Was Said
The precise language matters. Trump did not say the evidence was unclear or the question was unresolved. He said "I have President Putin; he said it's not Russia." He cited Putin's personal denial as countervailing evidence against the conclusion of the entire U.S. intelligence apparatus.
He then described Putin as having been "extremely strong and powerful" in his denial — a characterization that read, and was widely received, as approval.
The Two-Hour Meeting
The private meeting between Trump and Putin lasted approximately two hours. There was no U.S. notetaker — a departure from standard presidential summit practice. Trump reportedly demanded the U.S. interpreter's notes afterward. The content of what was discussed has never been fully disclosed.
Congressional Republicans sought to compel the interpreter to testify before Congress. The administration declined to make her available.
The Correction That Wasn't
The "wouldn't/would" correction Trump offered the next day was immediately scrutinized. At the same press conference, Trump had made multiple other statements suggesting the same position — that Putin's denial carried weight, that the investigation was a "witch hunt," that "both sides" bore responsibility for the poor state of U.S.-Russia relations. Changing one word in one sentence did not resolve the contradiction.
Timeline
Sequence of events
July 16, 2018
Helsinki summit and press conference
Trump and Putin meet privately for approximately two hours. At the public press conference, Trump declines to endorse the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, stating he trusts Putin's denial. Bipartisan condemnation follows immediately.
July 17, 2018
Trump claims he misspoke
Trump returns to the White House and reads a prepared statement claiming he misspoke — that he meant to say 'wouldn't' instead of 'would' when discussing Russian interference. He immediately adds 'could be other people also' — suggesting the reclarification was not the full picture of his position.
July 18, 2018
Trump backtracks on the backtrack
In an interview, Trump introduces a new qualifier, raising doubts about whether his 'wouldn't' correction represented his actual view. Congress introduces legislation to prevent the administration from implementing any agreements made in the private Helsinki meeting.
Sources
- ↑ Trump, at Putin's Side, Questions U.S. Intelligence on 2016 Election — The New York Times
- ↑ Trump sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence — The Washington Post
- ↑ Trump sides with Putin on election interference at Helsinki summit — The Associated Press
- ↑ Intelligence Community Assessment: Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections — Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Verification