Reading mode Exit reading mode

War Criminal Pardons: Gallagher, Lorance, Golsteyn — Undermining Military Justice

The Gallagher case was the most prominent: he had been reported by his own platoon members, who described him as 'freaking evil' and said they feared he would shoot civilians and colleagues. He was convicted by court-martial of posing with a corpse but acquitted of murder after a key prosecution witness changed his testimony. Trump followed the verdict by restoring Gallagher's rank and then, overriding Defense Secretary Esper's objections, blocking the Navy SEALs from removing Gallagher's Trident pin (the insignia of qualification). Navy Secretary Richard Spencer was fired after he sought a compromise with the White House outside normal channels. The pardons were condemned by military ethics experts as undermining the uniform code and the military's commitment to the laws of armed conflict.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

Systematic actions that undermine fundamental constitutional or international legal protections at the structural level. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Washington, D.C.
Category
Military Overreach
Legal posture
Reported
War-crime classification
Confirmed
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
Yes
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-first-term-war-criminal-pardons-gallagher
Victims
Afghan civilians killed by Lorance; the teenage ISIS prisoner allegedly killed by Gallagher while sedated; Afghan detainee allegedly killed by Golsteyn; SEALs and soldiers who reported the conduct and faced retaliation or disillusionment; the integrity of the laws of armed conflict and military justice
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President; granted pardons to convicted and accused war criminals over the objections of the Defense Secretary, military prosecutors, and service members who reported the conduct; blocked SEAL review of Gallagher's Trident; fired the Navy Secretary when he sought compromise— White House

Key points

  • Eddie Gallagher was reported by multiple members of his own SEAL platoon — not outsiders — who described him as 'freaking evil' and said he would 'kill anybody'; platoon members described him shooting at civilians including a young girl and an elderly man; he was also accused of stabbing a sedated teenage ISIS prisoner and then posing for photographs with the corpse; he was convicted of the photograph charge; multiple SEALs submitted sworn statements about the stabbing
  • Clint Lorance was convicted by court-martial in 2013 of murder for ordering his soldiers to open fire on unarmed Afghan men — a motorcycle group; two soldiers in his platoon also convicted testified against him; three Afghans were killed; Lorance had taken command of his platoon two days before the incident; Trump pardoned him November 15, 2019
  • Defense Secretary Mark Esper opposed Trump's interference in the Gallagher case and had authorized the Navy SEALs review board to potentially revoke Gallagher's Trident pin; Trump ordered the review stopped by tweet; Esper and Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley both raised concerns about the pardons' effects on military discipline and the laws of armed conflict
  • Navy Secretary Richard Spencer was fired by Defense Secretary Esper (at Trump's direction) after Spencer had attempted to negotiate a deal with the White House outside normal channels that would have let Gallagher retire with his Trident; Esper stated he lost confidence in Spencer; the underlying dispute was Trump's interference in military disciplinary proceedings
  • The SEALs who reported Gallagher's conduct faced significant backlash within the military and the SEAL community; some described receiving threats; Gallagher publicly identified the SEALs who had reported him and their families; the experience was described by military justice experts as having a chilling effect on reporting of misconduct
  • Trump's pardons were defended by supporters as protecting warriors from prosecutions driven by political correctness; military law experts and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs stated publicly that the pardons undermined the rule of law within the military and the U.S. commitment to the laws of armed conflict, which depend on credible internal enforcement

Overview

The SEALs who reported Eddie Gallagher were his platoon members. Not investigators, not prosecutors, not outsiders with agendas. The people who had served alongside him, in the same unit, in the same deployments. They submitted sworn statements describing conduct they characterized as evil.

Trump pardoned him. The Navy Secretary who tried to find a compromise was fired. The SEALs who reported the conduct had their names made public by Gallagher.

The Platoon's Reports

The SEALs who reported Gallagher's conduct described specific incidents in sworn statements: shooting at civilians including a young girl and an elderly man; stabbing a sedated teenage prisoner and posing with the body; threatening to kill SEALs who reported his behavior. They used the word "evil." They said they feared he would shoot them.

These were not disgruntled former colleagues. They were his team, submitting formal reports through military channels while still deployed.

The Pardons

Lorance had been convicted by court-martial. Two of his own soldiers testified against him. He had ordered men to fire on unarmed Afghans. He had been in command of his platoon for two days.

Trump pardoned him.

Golsteyn was accused of killing an unarmed detainee. The case had not gone to trial. Trump pardoned him preemptively.

Gallagher had been convicted of posing with a prisoner's corpse — the photograph charge. Trump restored his rank and then blocked the Navy's internal review of his SEAL status.

The Institutional Response

Esper and Milley raised concerns. Military law experts were unambiguous: the pardons undermined the UCMJ and the U.S. commitment to the laws of armed conflict. The United States enforces those laws partly by holding its own personnel accountable. When the president signals that conviction doesn't matter, the enforcement credibility collapses.

The Navy Secretary who tried to find a path that preserved some of that credibility was fired.

The SEALs who reported what they saw had their names released by the man they had reported.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Geneva ConventionsCommon Article 3 / Geneva Convention IVProhibit murder, mutilation, and cruel treatment of persons taking no active part in hostilities; the pardons of individuals convicted or accused of such acts undermine U.S. obligations to enforce international humanitarian law within its own armed forces
Uniform Code of Military JusticeArticles 118, 134Murder of prisoners and detainees is a crime under the UCMJ; Trump's pardons and interference with military proceedings subverted the military justice system that enforces these laws

Update log

  1. Based on November 2019 pardons and Navy Secretary firing.

Sequence of events

  1. Trump signals potential Gallagher pardon — before trial

    Trump intervenes in Gallagher's pre-trial confinement, ordering him moved to less restrictive conditions, signaling administration interest in the case before the court-martial verdict.

  2. Gallagher acquitted of murder — convicted of photograph

    Eddie Gallagher is acquitted of murder and most charges after the prosecution's key witness changes his testimony in court. He is convicted of posing with the corpse of a prisoner — a lesser charge. The case draws significant attention.

  3. Trump pardons Lorance and Golsteyn — restores Gallagher's rank

    Trump pardons Clint Lorance and Mathew Golsteyn, restores Eddie Gallagher's rank, and announces he will not allow the military to review Gallagher's SEAL status. Defense Secretary Esper and Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley have both raised concerns.

  4. Trump blocks SEAL review by tweet — fires Navy Secretary

    Trump tweets that he will not allow the Navy to remove Gallagher's Trident pin. Navy Secretary Spencer is subsequently fired for negotiating outside normal channels with the White House. Esper carries out the firing.

  5. Military leadership expresses concerns publicly

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Milley and others raise public concerns about the pardons' effects on military discipline and the laws of armed conflict. Esper states the pardons created a difficult situation for military leadership. SEAL community is divided.

Sources

  1. Trump Pardons Military Members in War Crimes Cases — The New York Times
  2. Trump pardons three service members accused or convicted of war crimes — The Washington Post
  3. Trump pardons soldiers accused or convicted of war crimes — The Associated Press
  4. Navy SEALs Reported a War Crime. Then Everything Went Wrong. — The New York Times

How this record was published

Manually curated This entry was added directly and does not carry an automated audit trail.

About our editorial methodology →

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    MOAB Strike in Afghanistan: First Combat Use of Largest Non-Nuclear Bomb

    U.S. forces dropped the MOAB on an ISIS-Khorasan tunnel complex in Achin district, Nangarhar Province. It was the bomb's first combat use. Trump said he had authorized 'another successful job' but defense officials indicated the decision was made at the field commander level without direct presidential sign-off. Afghan and UN officials disputed casualty figures and raised concerns about civilian impact in surrounding villages.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Shayrat Airbase Strike: Unilateral Military Action Against Syria Without Congressional Authorization

    Following a chemical weapons attack on Khan Shaykhun attributed to the Assad regime, Trump ordered a cruise missile strike on the airbase allegedly used to launch the attack. The strike was conducted without Congressional authorization and without a UN Security Council mandate. U.S. officials pre-warned Russia, which warned Syrian forces. The airbase was operational again within hours.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    First-Term Pardons: Rewarding Allies Who Protected Trump from Prosecution

    Trump's end-of-term pardons formed a pattern: the beneficiaries were overwhelmingly personal associates, political allies, or people whose silence or loyalty had protected Trump from prosecutorial pressure. Manafort and Stone had both been convicted in Mueller's investigation. Flynn had pleaded guilty twice to lying to the FBI. Bannon was under indictment for fraud. The pardons rewarded loyalty and silence — establishing that cooperation with investigators would not be protected, while non-cooperation would be.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Mueller Investigation Obstruction: Witness Tampering, McGahn, Flynn Pardon Signal

    The Mueller Report documented a sustained pattern of obstruction. Trump ordered McGahn to fire Mueller in June 2017; McGahn refused and prepared to resign. Trump later ordered McGahn to publicly deny having received this order; McGahn refused. Trump publicly praised associates who did not cooperate and attacked those who did. His private communications with Manafort were described in court filings as reassuring Manafort that a pardon was a possibility, potentially discouraging cooperation. Mueller concluded that Congress, not the Special Counsel, was the appropriate institution to address obstruction given OLC policy against indicting a sitting president.