Major Abuse of Power

Catch and Kill: National Enquirer's AMI Suppressed Stories to Protect Trump's 2016 Campaign

The National Enquirer's 'catch and kill' program operated by buying the rights to stories from people with negative accounts of Trump — paying them for exclusives and then killing the stories. AMI purchased stories involving alleged sexual affairs and other damaging material. Federal prosecutors concluded the scheme constituted illegal campaign contributions; AMI entered a non-prosecution agreement admitting this. David Pecker's cooperation was central to the conviction of Michael Cohen and the eventual conviction of Trump himself.

Overview

The National Enquirer is a supermarket tabloid. Under David Pecker, it was also an arm of Donald Trump's political operation.

The "catch and kill" scheme was sophisticated. When someone with a negative story about Trump came forward — an alleged affair, damaging personal information, potentially embarrassing accounts — AMI would purchase the exclusive rights to the story. Purchasing exclusives is normal tabloid journalism. Killing the story after purchasing the exclusive is something different: it converts the money paid from a journalism transaction into a suppression payment.

The Karen McDougal Payment

Karen McDougal was a former Playmate who alleged a nine-month romantic relationship with Trump beginning in 2006 — after Melania had given birth to their son. AMI paid her $150,000 for her story in August 2016, near the height of the presidential campaign.

The story was never published.

Federal prosecutors concluded this was an illegal in-kind campaign contribution: AMI had spent $150,000 to suppress information that could have damaged the campaign, and the payment was coordinated with the campaign. AMI admitted this in its non-prosecution agreement.

The 'Safe'

Among the more concerning elements of the arrangement was the existence of a document collection — informally called the "safe" — containing materials AMI had acquired from or about celebrities and public figures. The nature and extent of the safe's contents, and what if anything was ever done with them, remain partly obscured. Ronan Farrow's reporting for The New Yorker detailed the arrangement and its implications for leverage.

The 2024 Trial

Pecker testified in detail at Trump's 2024 Manhattan trial, describing the surrogate arrangement and the catch-and-kill scheme under oath. His testimony was central to the prosecution's narrative about the broader scheme to influence the 2016 election — of which the hush money payments were the culminating piece.

Timeline

Sequence of events

  1. Pecker-Cohen meeting — 'surrogate' agreement

    David Pecker, Cohen, and Trump meet at Trump Tower and agree that Pecker will act as an 'eyes and ears' for the campaign — alerting Cohen to negative stories and suppressing or acquiring them. The agreement is described in detail in AMI's non-prosecution agreement.

  2. AMI pays Karen McDougal $150,000

    AMI pays former Playmate Karen McDougal $150,000 for exclusive rights to her account of a nine-month affair with Trump. The story is never published. The payment is later characterized by federal prosecutors as an illegal campaign contribution.

  3. Cohen pays Stormy Daniels $130,000

    Using the same framework, Cohen — aware of the McDougal approach — pays Stormy Daniels $130,000 for her silence. AMI is aware of the payment.

  4. Cohen pleads guilty — implicates Trump

    Cohen pleads guilty and states the hush money payments were made at Trump's direction for campaign purposes.

  5. AMI enters non-prosecution agreement

    AMI admits in a non-prosecution agreement with SDNY that the McDougal payment was made in coordination with the Trump campaign for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election — admitting a campaign finance felony while avoiding prosecution in exchange for cooperation.

  6. Pecker testifies at Trump trial

    At Trump's Manhattan criminal trial, Pecker testifies in detail about the arrangement with Trump and Cohen, describing the catch-and-kill scheme and his role as a tip line for the campaign. His testimony is a key element in the prosecution's case.

Sources

  1. AMI Admits to Helping Trump, Signs Non-Prosecution Agreement — The New York Times
  2. The National Enquirer, Donald Trump, and a Decades-Long Relationship — The New Yorker
  3. What is the 'catch and kill' scheme and how does it work? — The Washington Post
  4. AMI admits campaign finance violation in non-prosecution deal — The Associated Press

Verification

Publication provenance

Related records

Updated May 30, 2024 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

Stormy Daniels Hush Money: Campaign Finance Felony and Directed Fraud

The $130,000 payment to Daniels was made by Cohen 11 days before the 2016 election to prevent her account from influencing voters. Trump reimbursed Cohen through Trump Organization checks falsely …

Sources
4
Updated November 27, 2019 Corruption & Self-Dealing
Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

Trump Tower Moscow: Active Negotiations During 2016 Campaign, Covered Up

The Trump Tower Moscow project involved Cohen emailing Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov's office in January 2016 seeking Putin's personal assistance advancing the project. Trump signed a letter of …

Sources
4