Reading mode Exit reading mode

Trump Pardons Blackwater Guards Convicted of Killing Iraqi Civilians at Nisour Square (2020)

Trump pardoned four Blackwater guards whom US courts had convicted of killing Iraqi civilians, including a 9-year-old boy, in Baghdad in 2007. The UN human rights office said the pardons 'contribute to impunity'; a survivor who testified at trial said he was 'really shocked.'

Record summary

Grade

Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

International crime

No international crime alleged

Systematic actions that undermine fundamental constitutional or international legal protections at the structural level. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Nisour Square, Baghdad, Iraq
Category
Rule of Law
Legal posture
Executive action
ICC relevance
No
Civilian casualties
14
Sources
3 cited
Stable ID
blackwater-nisour-square-pardons-2020
Legal basis
Presidential pardon power (US Constitution Art. II, §2); assessed against the duty to prosecute serious violations of the laws of war and the ICCPR right to an effective remedy.
Posture note
The pardons are a matter of public record. The underlying killings were adjudicated by US federal courts; the convictions stood when the pardons were granted. No court can review a pardon. The UN Human Rights Office's statement is a political-legal assessment, not a finding.
Victims
Fourteen Iraqi civilians killed and 17 wounded, as reported by NPR, among them 9-year-old Ali Kinani. Paul Dickinson, a lawyer for victims' families, names in The Intercept others killed or injured, including Mahde Shamke, 25, a taxi driver, and Ghasson Mahmood, 55, a civil engineer who died of a brain injury more than a year later.
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, Granted the pardons— White House

Key points

  • On December 22, 2020 Trump pardoned Nicholas Slatten, Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard, convicted in 2014 for the 2007 Nisour Square shooting; their sentences ranged from 12 years to life, with Slatten, whom prosecutors said started the shooting, serving life (NPR).
  • NPR reported 14 Iraqi civilians killed and 17 wounded. Among the dead was a 9-year-old boy, named by Paul Dickinson, a lawyer who sued Blackwater on behalf of Iraqi families, as Ali Kinani, shot in the head in his father's car (NPR; Dickinson in The Intercept).
  • Dickinson describes the FBI inquiry as 'its most comprehensive and expensive criminal investigation since 9/11' (The Intercept).
  • The White House justified the pardons by the men's military service, a D.C. Circuit ruling that 'additional evidence should have been presented at Mr. Slatten's trial', and a late disclosure that the lead Iraqi investigator 'may have had ties to insurgent groups himself' (White House statement, December 22, 2020).
  • The UN Human Rights Office: 'Pardoning them contributes to impunity and has the effect of emboldening others to commit such crimes' (NPR).
  • Hassan Salman, a victim who testified at trial: 'I'm really shocked... I had never imagined that Trump or any other politician would affect American justice' (NPR).

What happened

On September 16, 2007, Blackwater contractors guarding a US State Department convoy opened fire in Nisour Square, Baghdad. NPR reports that 14 Iraqi civilians were killed and 17 wounded; other counts are higher. Paul Dickinson, a lawyer who represented Iraqi families in civil suits against Blackwater, names among the dead, in an opinion piece for The Intercept, Ali Kinani, 9, shot in the head in his father's SUV; Mahde Shamke, 25, a taxi driver; and Ghasson Mahmood, 55, a civil engineer who died of a brain injury after suffering from his wounds for more than a year. The FBI investigation that followed was, in Dickinson's words, "its most comprehensive and expensive criminal investigation since 9/11."

A US federal jury convicted four guards in 2014. Nicholas Slatten, whom prosecutors said started the shooting, received life imprisonment; Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard received sentences that, with Slatten's, ranged from 12 years to life (NPR).

On December 22, 2020 President Trump pardoned all four. The White House statement said the men "were working in Iraq in 2007 as security contractors responsible for securing the safety of United States personnel," cited their military service, said the D.C. Circuit had ruled "that additional evidence should have been presented at Mr. Slatten's trial," and said prosecutors had "recently disclosed—more than 10 years after the incident—that the lead Iraqi investigator ... may have had ties to insurgent groups himself."

The UN Human Rights Office responded: "Pardoning them contributes to impunity and has the effect of emboldening others to commit such crimes" (NPR). Hassan Salman, wounded in the shooting, who testified at the trial, said: "I'm really shocked... I had never imagined that Trump or any other politician would affect American justice." Dickinson wrote: "These men will now be free, despite their crimes, and they will not serve the time in prison they deserved" (The Intercept).

The underlying conduct. The killings took place during the armed conflict in Iraq and were adjudicated by US courts, with convictions that included first-degree murder (NPR, quoting the UN Human Rights Office). Whether they also amounted to war crimes was never tried; the US prosecuted them under domestic law, which is a legitimate way of meeting the duty to punish.

The pardon. The act assessed here is the pardon, not the shooting.

  • Duty to prosecute and punish. The Geneva Conventions oblige states to bring to justice persons who commit grave breaches, and the ICCPR's right to an effective remedy (Art. 2(3)) has been read by the Human Rights Committee to make impunity for arbitrary killings a violation in itself. As the UN office noted, the US had met its obligations by prosecuting the guards. The pardon then reversed that result, releasing people convicted of killing civilians before they had served their sentences.
  • Not a Rome Statute crime. A pardon is not an act listed in Articles 6, 7 or 8, and it is not complicity in a completed crime under Article 25(3). It does not meet any international-crime definition.

Strongest defence argument. The pardon power is plenary under the US Constitution, and the White House gave case-specific reasons: Slatten's first conviction had been overturned on appeal, and the government disclosed late that an Iraqi investigator may have had insurgent ties. These reasons might bear on Slatten's retrial. They do not explain pardoning all four men, three of whom were not the subject of the appellate ruling cited, and they do not rebut the jury's findings that civilians were unlawfully killed.

Why this grade

Critical. The rubric places structural attacks on accountability in critical. Wiping out the sentences of men convicted by US courts of killing civilians in a war zone undoes the one form of accountability the case produced and, in the UN office's words, emboldens others. The grade matches the archive's entry on the Gallagher and related war-crime pardons. It is not extreme because a pardon is not itself a Rome Statute crime, and no international-crime evidence classification is assigned.

International law engaged

InstrumentProvisionWhat it protects or prohibits
Geneva Conventions (1949)Common Article 3; GC IV Article 146Protection of persons taking no active part in hostilities; duty to search for and prosecute persons alleged to have committed grave breaches
International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsArticles 2(3) and 6Right to life and to an effective remedy; as interpreted by the Human Rights Committee, impunity for arbitrary killings is itself inconsistent with the Covenant

Sequence of events

  1. Nisour Square shooting

    Blackwater guards escorting a US State Department convoy open fire in Nisour Square, Baghdad. NPR reports 14 Iraqi civilians killed and 17 wounded.

  2. Trump pardons all four

    The White House announces full pardons, citing the men's military service, a D.C. Circuit ruling on evidence at Slatten's first trial, and a late disclosure about the Iraqi lead investigator.

  3. UN, survivors condemn the pardons

    The UN Human Rights Office says the pardons 'contribute to impunity'; a survivor and a lawyer for victims' families condemn them (NPR; The Intercept).

Sources

  1. Shock And Dismay After Trump Pardons Blackwater Guards Who Killed 14 Iraqi Civilians — NPR
  2. I Sued Blackwater for the Massacre of Iraqi Civilians. Trump Just Pardoned Those Convicted Killers. (Paul Dickinson, opinion) — The Intercept
  3. Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding Executive Grants of Clemency (December 22, 2020) — The White House (archived)

How this record was published

Related records

Linked by the editors.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    War Criminal Pardons: Gallagher, Lorance, Golsteyn — Undermining Military Justice

    The Gallagher case was the most prominent: he had been reported by his own platoon members, who described him as 'freaking evil' and said they feared he would shoot civilians and colleagues. He was convicted by court-martial of posing with a corpse but acquitted of murder after a key prosecution witness changed his testimony. Trump followed the verdict by restoring Gallagher's rank and then, overriding Defense Secretary Esper's objections, blocking the Navy SEALs from removing Gallagher's Trident pin (the insignia of qualification). Navy Secretary Richard Spencer was fired after he sought a compromise with the White House outside normal channels. The pardons were condemned by military ethics experts as undermining the uniform code and the military's commitment to the laws of armed conflict.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Presidential Pardons: Political Allies and Corrupt Officials Pardoned

    Trump granted clemency 237 times in his first term (144 pardons and 94 commutations), including 143 grants on his last full day in office. Analysts documented that a disproportionate share of Trump's pardons went to political allies, relatives of political allies, or individuals whose cases were connected to Trump's political interests. The pardons of Manafort, Stone, Flynn, and Bannon were specifically notable because each had been convicted or charged in connection with conduct related to Trump's political activities, and each received executive clemency. The final day pardons also included Steve Bannon, who was awaiting trial.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Executive Order 13928: First-Term Sanctions on ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda (2020)

    Trump used a national-emergency sanctions order to freeze the assets of the ICC's chief prosecutor and a senior aide because the court was investigating possible crimes by US personnel in Afghanistan. Human Rights Watch called it a 'perverse use of sanctions, devised for alleged terrorists and drug kingpins.' The order was revoked in 2021.

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Trump Pardons Sheriff Joe Arpaio for Defying a Court Order Against Racial Profiling (2017)

    A federal judge found Arpaio guilty of deliberately defying a court order meant to stop his deputies from detaining Latino drivers on immigration suspicion alone. Trump pardoned him before he could be sentenced, removing the courts' criminal sanction for an official's defiance of an order protecting constitutional rights.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    ICC Immunity Demands: Ultimatum to Amend Rome Statute and Exempt Americans from War Crimes Prosecution

    A systematic campaign to destroy the International Criminal Court's ability to hold Americans accountable for war crimes, combining unprecedented sanctions on judges with demands to rewrite the Rome Statute itself. The campaign goes far beyond any previous US opposition to the ICC, seeking not merely non-cooperation but the permanent restructuring of international criminal justice.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    First-Term Pardons: Rewarding Allies Who Protected Trump from Prosecution

    Trump's end-of-term pardons formed a pattern: the beneficiaries were overwhelmingly personal associates, political allies, or people whose silence or loyalty had protected Trump from prosecutorial pressure. Manafort and Stone had both been convicted in Mueller's investigation. Flynn had pleaded guilty twice to lying to the FBI. Bannon was under indictment for fraud. The pardons rewarded loyalty and silence — establishing that cooperation with investigators would not be protected, while non-cooperation would be.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Mueller Investigation Obstruction: Witness Tampering, McGahn, Flynn Pardon Signal

    The Mueller Report documented a sustained pattern of obstruction. Trump ordered McGahn to fire Mueller in June 2017; McGahn refused and prepared to resign. Trump later ordered McGahn to publicly deny having received this order; McGahn refused. Trump publicly praised associates who did not cooperate and attacked those who did. The Mueller Report examined whether Trump's public and private statements about Manafort were intended to signal that a pardon was possible and so discourage cooperation. Mueller concluded that Congress, not the Special Counsel, was the appropriate institution to address obstruction given OLC policy against indicting a sitting president.