Reading mode Exit reading mode

Sondland Testimony: 'Everyone Was in the Loop' on Ukraine Quid Pro Quo

Sondland had originally testified in closed session that he had no knowledge of a quid pro quo involving military aid. After two other diplomats — William Taylor and Tim Morrison — submitted testimony contradicting Sondland's account, Sondland submitted a supplemental declaration amending his prior testimony to acknowledge he had told a Ukrainian official that the release of military assistance would likely not occur until Ukraine announced investigations. In his public testimony, Sondland went further, naming Pompeo, Mulvaney, and Bolton as aware of the arrangement and stating the quid pro quo was explicit.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

Executive actions that exceed constitutional authority, circumvent statutory constraints, or weaponize government institutions for political ends. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Location
Washington, D.C.
Category
Rule of Law
Legal posture
Reported
War-crime classification
Enabling conduct
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
No
Sources
3 cited
Stable ID
trump-sondland-quid-pro-quo-everyone-was-in-the-loop
Victims
Constitutional order; Ukraine's security; congressional oversight processes; integrity of foreign policy
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President; directed Ukraine quid pro quo per Sondland's testimony— White House
  • Gordon Sondland, EU Ambassador; acknowledged quid pro quo; named senior officials as being in the loop— U.S. State Department

Key points

  • Sondland testified that 'there was a quid pro quo' in the Ukraine affair — specifically that Ukrainian President Zelensky needed to announce investigations into Burisma (Hunter Biden's employer) and the 2016 election before the U.S. would grant a White House meeting
  • Sondland stated that Secretary of State Pompeo, Acting Chief of Staff Mulvaney, Energy Secretary Perry, and National Security Advisor Bolton were all 'in the loop' on the arrangement — placing the quid pro quo at the highest levels of the administration
  • Sondland had originally testified in closed session with no acknowledgment of a quid pro quo; after other witnesses contradicted him, he submitted an amended declaration acknowledging he had told a Ukrainian official that military assistance was conditioned on investigations
  • Sondland described a July 10 meeting at the White House where Trump's National Security Advisor Bolton 'cut the meeting short' after Sondland raised the investigations linkage — Bolton later reportedly described the situation as a 'drug deal' he wanted no part of
  • When asked what Trump had told him about why he wanted the investigations, Sondland testified Trump said: 'I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing' — a conversation that occurred after the whistleblower complaint became public
  • Sondland was fired from his ambassadorship the day after Trump was acquitted in the Senate impeachment trial; he subsequently filed a lawsuit against Pompeo and the State Department

Overview

Gordon Sondland paid $1 million to Donald Trump's inaugural committee. In exchange, he received an ambassadorship to the European Union. He then testified before Congress that the president he had paid to appoint him had directed an illegal quid pro quo scheme and that the most senior officials in the U.S. government had known about it.

He was fired two days after Trump was acquitted.

The Amended Testimony

Sondland's original closed-door testimony was carefully unhelpful. He said he hadn't known about any quid pro quo. He said he didn't recall key conversations. He provided a version of events that did not implicate anyone.

Then two other witnesses testified to things he had said that contradicted his account. Faced with being caught in false testimony, Sondland amended his declaration to acknowledge what he had previously denied.

The Public Testimony

The public hearing was a different performance. Sondland arrived with a prepared opening statement that made his acknowledgment explicit and spread the liability upward: Pompeo, Mulvaney, Bolton, and Perry were all in the loop. This was not Sondland going rogue. This was official U.S. foreign policy, coordinated by the senior-most officials in the executive branch.

The Firing

Trump's spokesman said the firing had nothing to do with Sondland's testimony. This may be technically true. It is also true that Sondland was fired exactly two days after the president who fired him had been acquitted of charges that Sondland's testimony had supported.

Update log

  1. Updated with Sondland firing.

Sequence of events

  1. Sondland initial closed-door testimony

    Sondland testifies in closed session and provides testimony that he was unaware of any quid pro quo linking military aid to investigations. Other witnesses will subsequently contradict this account.

  2. Sondland amends testimony after contradictions

    After Taylor's and Morrison's testimony contradicts his account, Sondland submits an amended declaration acknowledging he had told a Ukrainian official that military assistance was probably conditioned on Ukraine announcing investigations.

  3. Sondland testifies publicly — 'everyone was in the loop'

    Sondland testifies publicly before the House Intelligence Committee, stating there was an explicit quid pro quo, that it involved military aid and a White House meeting, and that Pompeo, Mulvaney, Bolton, and Perry were all in the loop.

  4. Sondland fired two days after Senate acquittal

    Two days after Trump is acquitted in the Senate impeachment trial, Sondland is told his services are no longer required. Gordon Sondland had donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural committee to obtain the ambassador appointment.

Sources

  1. Sondland Testimony: 'There Was a Quid Pro Quo' on Ukraine — The New York Times
  2. Sondland says Trump directed Ukraine quid pro quo — The Washington Post
  3. Sondland: Everyone in the loop on Ukraine quid pro quo — The Associated Press

How this record was published

Manually curated This entry was added directly and does not carry an automated audit trail.

About our editorial methodology →

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 5 of 5: War Crime / Crime Against Humanity

    Ukraine Extortion and First Impeachment: Withholding Military Aid to Coerce Election Interference

    Trump conditioned release of congressionally-approved military aid on Ukraine's announcement of investigations targeting his political rival. The scheme, exposed by a whistleblower and confirmed by multiple witnesses including Trump's own ambassador to the EU, made national security funds contingent on Trump's personal electoral interests. The House voted to impeach; the Senate acquitted on party lines after blocking witness testimony.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    First Impeachment: Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress Over Ukraine

    The first impeachment arose from a July 25, 2019 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky in which Trump asked Ukraine to 'do us a favor' by investigating the Bidens and the 2016 election, while $391 million in congressionally approved military aid was being withheld. Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified that there was an explicit quid pro quo and 'everyone was in the loop.' Ambassador William Taylor testified that U.S. officials were told the aid was conditioned on the announcement of investigations. The Senate acquitted on party-line votes except for Romney, who voted to convict on the abuse of power article. Trump fired Sondland and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman (who had raised the alarm about the call) two days after the acquittal.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Hatch Act Violations: Using White House and Federal Resources for Campaign Events

    The 2020 Republican National Convention featured events staged at the White House — a building owned by the federal government and maintained with taxpayer funds — in ways that previous administrations of both parties had avoided. The OSC, which enforces the Hatch Act prohibiting federal employees from using their official capacity or government resources for political activity, found multiple violations. Secretary Pompeo's Jerusalem speech was the highest-profile Hatch Act referral; the OSC concluded he had violated the act. Other officials investigated included Kellyanne Conway (previously recommended for removal for Hatch Act violations in 2019). The naturalization ceremony conducted by USCIS Director Cuccinelli at the convention for five new citizens was also reviewed.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Ukraine Quid Pro Quo: Withheld $391 Million in Military Aid to Extort Investigation of Biden

    Ukraine had been under Russian military pressure since 2014. The $391 million in security assistance — congressionally appropriated bipartisan aid that had nothing to do with Biden — was withheld by Trump's Office of Management and Budget while the White House sought a Ukrainian announcement of investigations. The July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky documented the pressure: Trump told Zelensky he needed a 'favor' — an investigation of the 2016 election and of Biden — before the U.S. would proceed. A White House national security official filed a whistleblower complaint. The aid was eventually released in September 2019 after the whistleblower complaint became public.