Reading mode Exit reading mode

Emoluments: Foreign and Domestic Payments to Trump Properties Throughout Presidency

Trump retained ownership of his business empire throughout his presidency, rejecting the divestment that every modern president had undertaken. The Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C. — in the old Post Office Pavilion leased from the General Services Administration — was particularly notable: foreign governments and diplomatic delegations booked the hotel, and the GSA was both the landlord and a federal agency under presidential authority. Three lawsuits were filed against Trump under the Emoluments Clauses; all were ultimately dismissed without reaching the merits after Trump left office. Congressional oversight requests for information about foreign payments were resisted throughout.

Record summary

Grade

Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

Executive actions that exceed constitutional authority, circumvent statutory constraints, or weaponize government institutions for political ends. Scale and definitions

Status
Concluded
Incident date
Record updated
Location
Washington, D.C.
Legal posture
Reported
War-crime classification
Enabling conduct
Verification
Independently verified
ICC relevance
No
Sources
4 cited
Stable ID
trump-emoluments-mar-a-lago-payments
Victims
U.S. constitutional norms against presidential self-enrichment; government contracting integrity; foreign policy actors able to seek favor through financial transactions with the president's private businesses
Alleged responsible parties
  • Donald Trump, President; retained ownership of business empire receiving payments from foreign governments and domestic public agencies throughout presidency— Trump Organization / White House

Key points

  • Trump refused to divest from his business empire, instead placing it in a trust managed by his sons — a structure that ethics officials across administrations noted did not eliminate conflicts of interest because Trump remained the beneficial owner and could withdraw funds at any time
  • The Washington Post investigation documented that at least 20 foreign governments — including China, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, and Turkey — had patronized Trump properties or made payments to Trump-related entities during his presidency
  • Saudi Arabia paid at least $270,000 to Trump International Hotel in Washington during a lobbying effort; the Saudi lobbying firm's payments to the Trump hotel were later used as evidence in emoluments litigation
  • The Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C. was in a building leased from the General Services Administration — a federal agency that reports to the president. The GSA lease explicitly prohibited elected officials from benefiting from the lease; the GSA found this did not disqualify Trump, a determination ethics lawyers called legally dubious
  • The Secret Service paid for rooms, golf cart rentals, and other services at Mar-a-Lago and Trump golf courses when protecting the president during visits there; Congressional Democrats documented over $1 million in payments from federal agencies to Trump properties during the presidency
  • All three major emoluments lawsuits (CREW v. Trump, Maryland and D.C. v. Trump, and Blumenthal v. Trump) were ultimately dismissed without reaching the merits — courts ruled challengers lacked standing or that the cases became moot when Trump left office

Overview

The Foreign Emoluments Clause — one of the Constitution's anti-corruption provisions written specifically to prevent foreign governments from gaining influence over U.S. officials through financial payments — prohibits the president from receiving payments from foreign governments without congressional consent.

Trump did not divest from his businesses. Foreign governments paid his hotels. The courts dismissed the lawsuits without reaching the merits.

The Hotels

Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C., a block from the White House, occupied a federal building leased from the General Services Administration. During the Trump presidency, it became a known gathering point for lobbyists, diplomatic delegations, and foreign government officials seeking proximity to the administration. The Washington Post documented more than $750,000 in payments from foreign governments to Trump properties in total — a figure widely understood to represent a floor rather than a ceiling, given limited disclosure.

The specific case of Saudi Arabia's lobbying payments — at least $270,000 to the Trump hotel while the kingdom was lobbying against JASTA (the law allowing families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia) — became a central exhibit in emoluments litigation.

The GSA Lease

The Trump International Hotel lease from the General Services Administration contained a provision explicitly prohibiting elected officials from benefiting. When Trump won the election while his company held the lease, the GSA — a federal agency under presidential authority — reviewed the conflict and found it was not disqualifying.

Ethics lawyers across the political spectrum described this determination as legally incoherent: the agency reporting to the president was deciding whether the president could benefit from his lease with that agency.

The Cases

Three major emoluments lawsuits were filed. None reached a decision on the merits. Courts dismissed them on standing or mootness grounds. The constitutional question of whether Trump's conduct violated the Emoluments Clauses was never adjudicated.

Update log

  1. Updated with lawsuit dismissals after Trump left office.

Sequence of events

  1. Trump takes office without divesting from businesses

    Trump is inaugurated while retaining ownership of his business empire. He places it in a trust managed by his sons but remains the beneficial owner. Ethics officials note this does not eliminate conflicts of interest.

  2. First emoluments lawsuit filed

    The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) files the first emoluments lawsuit challenging Trump's receipt of payments from foreign governments through his businesses.

  3. Maryland and D.C. file emoluments suit

    The attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia file an emoluments lawsuit, arguing that Trump International Hotel is harming competing businesses and that foreign payments violate the constitutional prohibition.

  4. Washington Post documents $750,000+ in foreign government payments

    The Washington Post investigation documents at least $750,000 in payments from at least 20 foreign governments to Trump properties since his inauguration — including Saudi Arabia's $270,000 lobbying payments.

  5. Emoluments lawsuits dismissed after Trump leaves office

    Federal appeals courts dismiss the remaining emoluments lawsuits as moot after Trump leaves office. None of the cases reached a ruling on the merits of the constitutional claims.

Sources

  1. The Emoluments Lawsuits Against Trump Are Dropped After He Leaves Office — The New York Times
  2. Foreign governments paid Trump hotel at least $750,000 since he took office — The Washington Post
  3. Foreign payments to Trump properties during presidency — The Associated Press
  4. Trump International Hotel — Federal Leasing Oversight — U.S. Government Accountability Office

How this record was published

Related records

Similar by category, grade and tags.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Emoluments Violations: Profiting from Foreign and Domestic Governments While President

    Unlike every president in modern history, Trump refused to divest from his businesses, instead placing them in a trust managed by his sons. Foreign governments and domestic government agencies spent millions at Trump properties during his presidency. Courts dismissed emoluments cases on procedural grounds rather than merits; a House investigation documented over $750,000 in government spending at Trump properties through 2020.

  • Grade 4 of 5: Critical Rights and Rule-of-Law Concern

    Presidential Conflicts of Interest: Trump Refused to Divest from Business Empire

    Prior presidents had either sold their business assets or placed them in blind trusts managed by independent trustees. Trump placed his holdings in a revocable trust managed by his sons Donald Jr. and Eric, with Trump retaining the ability to revoke the trust at any time and receiving financial reports about the businesses. The Office of Government Ethics stated the arrangement was insufficient to prevent conflicts. The Trump International Hotel in Washington, housed in a federally-owned building under a lease Trump's own government administered, became a center of lobbying activity, with foreign governments and domestic interest groups booking events and rooms to seek favorable treatment. Saudi Arabia spent more than $270,000 at the hotel in a single year.

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Veterans Affairs: Mar-a-Lago Members Shaped Policy, VA Secretary Firing

    The ProPublica investigation documented a 'shadow VA' in which the three Mar-a-Lago members — who paid $200,000 entry fees — exchanged hundreds of calls and emails with VA officials, reviewed candidates for top positions, influenced multimillion-dollar contract decisions including a $10 billion electronic health records contract, and shaped the VA's strategic direction without any official appointment. VA Secretary Shulkin had cooperated with the arrangements. He was fired amid internal feuding; Trump nominated his personal physician Ronny Jackson as replacement; Jackson withdrew after Senate investigators documented allegations of drunk driving, overprescribing, and creating a 'toxic work environment.'

  • Grade 2 of 5: Major Abuse of Power

    Presidential Pardons: Political Allies and Corrupt Officials Pardoned

    Trump issued 143 pardons and commutations, including a final batch of 143 on his last day in office. Analysts documented that a disproportionate share of Trump's pardons went to political allies, relatives of political allies, or individuals whose cases were connected to Trump's political interests. The pardons of Manafort, Stone, Flynn, and Bannon were specifically notable because each had been convicted or charged in connection with conduct related to Trump's political activities, and each received executive clemency. The final day pardons also included Steve Bannon, who was awaiting trial.